English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophers, thanks to all your answers. Have a great day!

2007-09-28 03:23:12 · 7 answers · asked by Third P 6 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

7 answers

You speak of souls as a representation of part of something. In my conviction, I believe that the soul of something is the whole being itself. A soul can't be good or evil because a soul is everything at once. A soul encompasses all you can be good and evil.

Yes I believe that in evil and good are inseparable in soul and in nature. Evil and good are always there together as reflections of each other and as "the other road not taken." For if you did not look at your reflection, would you really know how other people percieve you or there was any other way you could appear than your mental image.

I also believe that errors are inspired by truths for very few would make errors knowingly without seeing something truthful or what they truly believe is the truth.

I hope I gave you the scope of my belief.

2007-09-28 03:53:38 · answer #1 · answered by The One Truth 4 · 3 0

The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative. Is the universe of the Will only? Is the Will pure of Judgments Judging? No. There is no soul of anything for anything else; everything is what it is, everything is a thing in its self as unique and as a member of a universality, i.e. individual essence, no matter our concept or notion of a thing, it is what it is and no other. For each Judgment, there is individuality and change for that individual. A person evil today or good today may be Judged oppositely tomorrow, but the Judgment Judges only on a certain negative, but the Will may immediately know what is good for it. The Will does not know everything and that is the risk.

2007-09-28 14:40:31 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

there is a soul of goodness in things evil as there is soul of truth truth in things erroneous. this is because "evil" is all a matter of perspective. anyone can provide justification for any deed which makes it the right or just thing to do in their eyes but not in others. take for example this rediculous war in iraq. you have the americans n' company barging in to this already unstable nation and trying to bring democracy and justness to a nation who doesn't agree with american ideology and who think it is evil and want nothing more than to put an end to it and all who believe in it for the better-ment of the world. either way, people are being killed. but both can easily justify their particular side as being "just" due to ethnocentrism. this is a concept inherent in human nature and being that there is no completely nuetral arbitrator to sort things out...well, no one can really truly say who is acting out of goodness in the matter and who is acting out of evilness in the matter.

2007-09-28 09:32:30 · answer #3 · answered by kestrelk8 6 · 0 0

I don't think there's a soul in things. But all people are a mix of good and evil. Each of us chooses which side to feed.

2007-09-28 03:45:43 · answer #4 · answered by almac 3 · 1 0

there is no soul. only chemicals. no one has ever proved the existence of a soul, it is only a belief. many people believe in a soul to try and fill in the emptiness of a chemical-bound existence. from the soul, they develop religion.

2007-09-28 03:34:56 · answer #5 · answered by blank 1 · 0 1

There is good but parents teach evil

2007-09-28 03:46:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There may be. But I'm not gonna waste a lot of time looking for it.

Doug

2007-09-28 03:43:51 · answer #7 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers