Maybe we can import Pakistan's Supreme Court to help out here. What do you think? Should our 'president' run again?
2007-09-28 01:41:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dickn2000: that's really thinking outside the box, fella!
2007-09-28 01:49:10 · update #1
It's called TERM LIMITS! Your idea to import Pakistan's Supreme Court is not without merit however. Once we have them here we could shoot them all.
2007-09-28 01:47:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, the Supreme Court cannot overrule the Constitution and since the 22nd Amendment says:
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
George can't run again.
Wise people, those amendment makers.
2007-09-28 09:09:06 · answer #2 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have an amendment to the US Constitution which says a President can only serve two terms. We don't need another amendment.
2007-09-28 08:45:16 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
our presidents can only run for 2 terms and serve no more than 10 years. we came up with that law after F.D.R. held onto the presidency like the pope.
2007-09-28 08:46:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. check the US constitution (yeah that old piece of paper)
2. Musharref is not going to run -- he's stepping down b/4
they shoot him -- Butto is goona run and then she'll be run
out of the country (again) for corruption in couple years
2007-09-28 08:46:27 · answer #5 · answered by de viking 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I were Mushy, I'd be trembling in my boots incase Barack gets elected. After all, according to Barack, He would attack Pakistan.
LOL
2007-09-28 08:48:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Musharref is not a violent terrorist is he? What relevance is that to our elections? It is the ideas that live on and the progress that is documented. Persons love to bash politicians. What they can't understand they fear. You must be very fearful today.
2007-09-28 08:49:24 · answer #7 · answered by nsprdwmn 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The difference is that all of our presidential candidates are really just the same person with the same pro-corporate agenda. Here in the U.S., it doesn't really make any difference who wins.
"If voting changed anything, they would make it illegal." -- Emma Goldman
2007-09-28 08:46:40 · answer #8 · answered by Trevor S 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I wonder
2007-09-28 08:44:09 · answer #9 · answered by dviakal78 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2007-09-28 08:44:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋