English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why haven't we started bombing the Dictators in Burma? We did in Iraq and destroyed their Dictator...

2007-09-28 01:34:46 · 15 answers · asked by Dream Realized 2 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

America, Canada, and many others do big business with China. China basically has the say in Burma. So again its to "protect" interests. If we give a heavy foot to China, what would happen then? Thats for another question:

But God bless and keep the monks safe as they are peace loving people more than any in the world, and may other peaceful religious leaders also begin to march. Nothing is not possible. Ghandi, Mandela, we only have to pray and have hope. Peace!
Dictators are all the same, they have no morals or respect for others opinions or beliefs, Where do the dictators live in Burma, in a castle on the hill, where do the dictators in Iraq live? In a beautiful place called "The Green Zone" with green trees, fresh air, few if any bombs, and far away from the oppressed, poor, innocent ones. To answer the first question. lol. Sorry if I did it the other way around . Peace Humanist.

2007-09-28 01:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by HopelessZ00 6 · 2 0

Burma is under direct control and protection of China.

One Lone wolf Like saddam is a better target. And Of course the Oil is nice too! Do you "work for free?"

2007-09-28 01:39:43 · answer #2 · answered by ThorGirl 4 · 1 1

sanctions and pressure on Burma harm the people and achieve nothing but when applied to Cuba are very effective and destroy a hated political system , which survives, and provides doctors to help all other oppressed nations

2007-09-28 02:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by henry m 3 · 2 0

No Corp. Money wrapped up in Burma?

Plus the UN has started to draft them a really harsh letter.that should be finshed in six to eight months.

2007-09-28 05:42:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Burma doesn't worship the invisible sky god too unlike Iraq.

2007-09-28 01:37:43 · answer #5 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 1 1

Burma (Thank you for not calling it "Myanmar") is not going to be saved by America because there is no financial gain in it.

2007-09-28 01:38:41 · answer #6 · answered by Prosperous Parent 3 · 1 0

Theocracy is government based upon a undeniable deity, dictatorship is government based upon you doing in spite of I decree, God or no longer. You already knew that however, I purely think of you're trollin'.

2016-10-05 11:52:48 · answer #7 · answered by savitz 4 · 0 0

Wow, you wanna go bomb Burma. Well, Iraq was a success, wasn't it?

2007-09-28 01:50:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

oktaaaay genius:
1. Iraq has had elections -- they elected a parlimanent and by
definition are a democracy,
2. Mymaryar (Burma) is run by a military junta that controls all
the people

why don't consider educakin urself b/4 u stand on ur soapbox?

2007-09-28 01:40:12 · answer #9 · answered by de viking 4 · 1 4

There's no oil in Burma, I suppose.

2007-09-28 01:37:37 · answer #10 · answered by Tweet 3 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers