3=4. how possible?

Question

3=4? solve mathematically

Answer 1

Let us take a+b=c where a,b,c are constants

=>3a+3b=3c
=>3a+3b-3c=0

now if a+b=c
then 4a+4b=4c
=>4a+4b-4c=0

3a+3b-3c=4a+4b-4c
=> 3(a+b-c)=4(a+b-c)
=> 3=4 dividing both sides with a+b-c.

Thanks

Answer 2

If the question mark(?) after 4 would have the value of 0.75
i.e., 3 = 4?
=> 3 = 4 x 0.75
=> 3 = 3
=> hence proved mathematically......

Answer 3

Peter's proof is technically improper because the only time 2x=x is when 0=0, and division by zero is implicitly improper.

However, if you do permit division by zero then it does work, but you should be explicit about it. The only time you can get to 3=4 is when division by zero is permitted.

A more explicit division by zero proof goes as follows:

Let x=0.

Since x=0 then x+x=0+x and since you want 3=4 it is also true that x+x+x+x=0+x+x+x and it can further be shown to be true that nx=(n-1)x+0...still let us stick with 3=4

So, since x+x+x+x=0+x+x+x it is true that 4x=0+3x.

Since 4x=0+3x, 4x=3x.

Since division by 0 is explicitly permissible

4x/x=3x/x

It follows that 4=3.

More generally in the n case, it can be shown that if division by zero is permissible it can be shown by varying the number of explicit zeros, that all numbers equal all other numbers.

Answer 4

yes, very much possible
3=4 (mod 7)
check:25 divided by 7 =3 rem 4
so in modular arithmetic or congruence (in # theory) 3=4 (mod 7). to have a very clear view of my point, study modular arithmetic or congruence in number theory which is credited to one of my favourite mathematicians pierre de fermat,
also 5=0 (mod 3) 15/3 =5 rem. 0

Answer 5

let x=1 and y=1
now x=y
subtract y on both sides
x-y = y-y => x-y = 0
devide by x-y on both sides
(x-y)/(x-y) =0/(x-y)
=> 1=0
add 3 to both sides
3=4
this is the only way to do
but actually we are deviding by (x-y) which is 0
we should not devide by 0 so we are getting abrupt answers

Answer 6

Well, let's start
x^2 (squared)= x+x+x+x+...(x times)... +x
Let us take a derivative
2x=1+1+1+1+1+...(x times)...+1
2x=x
2=1
2+2=1+2
4=3
That's it!

Answer 7

3 = George Bush
4 = Osama bin Laden

3+4 = WAR

4-WAR = George Bush

Inverse of 4 = Good

So if George Bush = Good...

3=4.

Have a nice day.

Answer 8

Multiply both sides by 0!!!

Answer 9

its possible only if you consider complex roots....
and in that case you cannot prove it using real nos.......
which implies that the proof is only imaginary......

Answer 10

You and your maths ---------- Thou art grear.