While both agencies are concealing a lot of important information that could affect the health of billions of people across the globe, which one do you think is doing more serious harm to public health here in the U.S.?
2007-09-28 00:32:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I think they're both equal in their level of misdirection and misinformation. They're both 'PR' wings of the government, and both are tasked with making the public believe that things are safe. Only difference is EPA is about emissions and industry-level safety, and FDA is things we ingest, inject, or otherwise put in our bodies.
Both agencies can be bribed, swayed, corrupted. Both agencies issue "reports" that cetify something as safe or not.
I personally wouldn't trust either of them. It's a good thing you don't have to. Anything they can say, you can usually find out the truth if you do proper research and database cross-referencing.
2007-09-28 00:44:02 · answer #1 · answered by cjc1127 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both. They have no reason to exist.
We should be able to make our own decisions and buy and eat whatever we want.
It's stupid to think that a) they know better or b) they're not influenced by the corporations.
Without them, it seems that the market is more risky. But it's not, it's risky bu as much as it is today with them on the way. Plus, it's restricted to the products they want to allow. With more choices we could have better choices and cheaper choices.
2007-09-28 00:51:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both of them are doing a great deal to help safeguard the public health. They are not shady.
2007-09-28 00:41:13 · answer #3 · answered by Matthew O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. You have nothing to support your claims.
2007-09-28 00:34:51 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
EPA for sure.
2007-09-28 00:35:20 · answer #5 · answered by Austin M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, it is PETA
2007-09-28 00:35:14 · answer #6 · answered by Zenkai 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋