BEFORE , WHILE OR AFTER , THEMS HAD BEEN THE PRESIDENTS ? , if to compares with others parties.
2007-09-27 01:08:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
With the Democrats, it's sex.
With the Republicans, it's money.
2007-10-04 18:24:44 · answer #1 · answered by pufferoo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow - what racially charged question! look Your Majesty, the Obama administration in 2009 outspent by skill of a ingredient of 10 the over the Bush administration's 2007 finances three hundred and sixty 5 days. that's a certainty. Bush have been given hammered by skill of conservatives for failing to restrain spending extra and that's arguably between the great motives the Republicans lost the congress in 2006. that's merely that at that element, the TEA party hadn't shaped through fact the Republicans of that element, disappointing as they have been, did no longer upward push to the point of recklessness we've experienced this final three hundred and sixty 5 days or so. another factor formerly you tar Bush with the racist brush - you may desire to recollect that in the process 2004 he released a great investment initiative to help HIV and AIDS stricken human beings in Africa. he's likewise working with former president Clinton to boost money to help the folk of Haiti. He did no longer could do the two of those issues. i'm a white guy, and that i used to love our contemporary president on a private point. It wasn't his poor regulations that lost my affection for him, it replaced into the dishonorable way he went approximately pursuing them. Does that make me a racist? I supply you my solemn promise that if he have been white, it does no longer exchange my opinion of him one tiny bit. that's no longer continuously (or perhaps frequently) approximately race.
2016-10-09 22:10:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hummm corrosion... the only scandal of consequence during Harding's administration was teapot dome... it alleged an improper oil lease on public land without competitive bidding.
... I will add this: I doubt many people will be around the Internet much that remember it but, in its day, Ronald Reagan's divorce from his first wife, a famous Hollywood figure as well, caused quite a stir.
2007-09-27 01:21:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Quite a few presidents were involved in affairs, they were well know but quiet. Only one used his influence to get his "partner" as government job and then lied about it afterwards, strange but this "theme" of skirting around issues marked both of his terms.
2007-09-27 01:13:49 · answer #4 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Lincoln was known to sleep in beds with men, before president. So did Ismael and Quequiq in Moby Dick.
2007-09-27 01:23:20 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas Paine 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
As was already said Ike Eisenhower. He supposedly had an affair with his driver Kay Summersby. I don't recall all the details, but there you go.
2007-09-27 01:26:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Oh, yes. One only needs to look to the kindly, grandfatherly president Eisenhower.
2007-09-27 01:17:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You've never read about Warren G. Harding? He makes Clinton look like a wallflower.
2007-09-27 01:11:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
not in the last 80 years or so.
2007-09-27 01:15:17 · answer #9 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm guessing you're a Republican.
Would you like to know what makes me think that?
2007-09-27 01:11:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋