Do you think it's a good idea for Japan to introduce a jury system ?

Question

Currently, judges alone make decisions on cases brought before courts in Japan. Do you think a jury system will work well in Japan?

Answer 1

Jury systems are associated with France, Great Britain and the former colonies of both of those nations. That's why the U.S. and Canada have the jury system. Having lived in Japan for eight years, I was not bothered by a legal system which had cases tried before a single judge or panel of judges.
There were other aspects to "Nippon Ho" (Japanese Law) which were also quite pleasing. Not only can the defense appeal a verdict, so can the prosecution. Also, the prosecution can dismiss all or part of a charge if prosecuting it will not serve the interests of justice (Fukushi Shobun). The type of punishment meted out is dependant on whether it was a crime of intellect or a crime of evil intent.
The system works for them. Leave it alone.

Answer 2

What do you mean "before courts"? It is "in" courts.
And the jury system is not same as the US. Still judges are with jury there.
But people are already hating to attend courts as jury.

The system won't change much. It is just a pose and excuse as that they are listening to people.

Answer 3

Your question is actual rather theory scary. indexed right here are my concepts. voters serve the universal purpose of identifying ethical themes. Judges to interpret the regulations of regulation, and to word the effects as they think of are suitable. the place we've run into issues is two factors. One, The legislature has desperate that they might desire to mandate the size of time for sentences, in politically reward techniques. This has deliver approximately great unevenness in sentencing.under modern-day interpretation to be certain new regulations, or fail to implement regulations via jury nullification. 2, the different is that juries are advised that they are not permitted to apply nullification. An occasion of that's drug regulations, maximum folk have executed drugs, and have reservations approximately sending first time offenders to penitentiary, even nevertheless, needed minimums as they are written might require that. in basic terms some concepts. in case you get rid of the Jury from criminal concepts then you rather get rid of the human ingredient. interior the form of settlement disputes, judges would desire to be the identifying actual, via fact the themes are often complicated and previous the scope of know-how of the common jury.

Answer 4

I think so, but if the court system already works and it is fair and well balanced, why change? is there a problem with the current system?

Answer 5

ya i think it is ok , no imposible under the sun

Answer 6

no not at all