Nobody really knows but DaVinci.
But it looks like a man to me.
2007-09-26 20:48:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by fullofideas4u 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
nicely, this is incredibly a conundrum. individually i think of your questions are significant and deserve solutions. I assist you on your exploration, no remember the place it leads you. a non secular perception should not be pressured upon absolutely everyone. And too, an unexamined faith isn't worth lots. You sound like incredibly a large student, and that i commend you -- shop up the solid paintings. you will desire to be actual and real on your ideals or lack thereof, in any different case you isn't a chuffed individual. on your subject interestingly that is going to be difficult to do, seeing that your loved ones and church look as though they don't seem to be supportive on your faith exploration. from time to time youngsters only would desire to attend till they get out on their very own to overtly stay as they suspect. related to Adam, Eve and their sons -- some human beings (myself lined) think of that they weren't the sole human beings God created at that element, only the 1st. So that's attainable (and for sure even probably) that there have been others that God created, besides. the element is that Adam and Eve have been the 1st human beings interior the long line of folk wherein God's tale of redemption and provision could be stated and recorded. it is not unreasonable to think of this -- or maybe nonetheless the Bible tells lots of this tale, it would not tell each and every element. So shop exploring, asking your questions and investigating. and don't enable absolutely everyone inform you which you're incorrect for doing this.
2017-01-02 18:06:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if it were my last supper there would be .the truth is it's only an artist's depiction of a fabled word of hearsay. how is truth to enter into it . Was that the last supper...? We had supper just last night and we don't have to rise from the dead for our next meal!
2007-09-26 20:58:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Older Gnostics docs have talked about Mary Magdalene being the apostles of the apostles, understanding the most of what JC is talking about far deeper than all those men could comprehend taken all their brains together.. ( MM positional value has sparked the ire of the patriarchial Peter) Da Vinci knows these. It is most likely that the painter alludes that this is a woman ( MM) who , after all, stayed besides with JC most of his mission , as both of them completes the circle of God-Goddess spiritual dispensation.
2007-09-26 21:08:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The figure is St. John, who was portrayed as a young man, with no facial hair, in DaVinci's masterpiece.
This can be proved by consulting DaVinci's individual sketches for each figure that appears in the main piece.
To see it, scroll down to mid page, here:
http://www.sacred-destinations.com/italy/milan-santa-maria-delle-grazie-last-supper.htm?cid=31&id_site=93
2007-09-26 23:07:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nobody knows .everyone is making up his own story,like news paper reports.you always take articles as facts happening to others ,untill the day you see an article about yourself or someone close to you that is twisted,then you start disbelieving the newspapers.i know it happened to me in the last 20 years.never was an article spot on about my testimony,in a murder case.i told the reporter i was listening to the radio when i heard the scream.the newspaper said,i was watching television.2 days later i heard a knock on my door.it was the television licence dept asking me for my licence.i told them that i do not own a television.the guy pushed the article in my face,and told me to read.it took me about an hour to show him my appartment,and all the hidden closets before he believed me.that is why the bible warns about false testimonys.
2007-09-26 21:09:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by diego 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if it was a female pictured,it doesn't make a difference to Christianity.The painting is only Da Vinci's idea of what it was like.And as clever as he was,he couldn't have made a time machine to travel back 1462 years to observe it first hand.
2007-09-26 21:00:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Serena 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
To be honest, I really don't know.
In the event Mary Magdalene was what she claimed to be, in the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, I don't see why she wouldn't be amongst Jesus and his disciples at the Last Supper.
I also think the conspiracy theories are great. It's a great "what if...."
2007-09-26 20:54:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Adam G 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Considering the painting was made centuries after the alleged event, and is ridiculously faded to begin with (you have NO idea how much the pictures of it have been touched up), I don't see why it should matter to conspiracy theorists.
2007-09-26 20:50:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
That figure in the picture looks an awful lot like Devimci himself. A little feminized maybe, but him.
2007-09-26 20:56:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by capekicks 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
It's John, who is believed to have been fairly young when he began following Jesus. The same John who wrote Revelation sometime around 90 AD.
2007-09-26 20:53:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sarah B 2
·
4⤊
1⤋