2007-09-26 17:33:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Stephen...so it was a form of incest instead?
2007-09-26 17:41:51 · update #1
to have beastiality, there must be an animal involved. God is Spirit. Mary was a human female, not an animal. Not weird at all--miraculous, yes.
2007-09-26 17:40:11 · answer #1 · answered by winkcat 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. Read the Holy Bible for yourself if you want the answers. Get a New Living translation which is written in plain modern English. Then you won't have to ask such ridiculous questions.
2007-09-27 00:37:51 · answer #2 · answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i love the way that people can become so incensed by such a nonsensical query bravo taurus for making us think about our convictions personally i'm totally down with bestiality i might even be tempted to do a bull there miss taurus.
2007-09-27 22:37:28 · answer #3 · answered by joe c 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, look what he made Adam go through. That guy had to screw every animal until God had mercy on him (when he probably got done laughing his butt off) and made a woman Adam could impose himself upon. Remember Lilith would not submit and ran off leaving Adam alone with only his two good hands, now that they had come out of the trees.
2007-09-27 00:40:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Next, say He did it to the ground! poor fellow, did you even realize that Mary's geneology goes back to Adam, which was the son of God? But no this is waaaaay over your head, judgeing from your question, which you thought was funny! So Flag then! you're unaware thea that is entered in the scroll of rememberance. too bad...
2007-09-27 00:40:43 · answer #5 · answered by hamoh10 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Proverbs 13:16 - Every prudent man dealeth with knowledge: but a fool layeth open his folly.
2007-09-27 00:45:13 · answer #6 · answered by just a man 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
God created Mary, therefore it was no big deal for Him to RENDER her pregnant. He didn't have relations with her, He just changed something He created.
Love is spiritual, not physical.
2007-09-27 00:37:21 · answer #7 · answered by Stephen M 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
His genetics must be close enough to be compatible with humans to be able to reproduce with us. Which He may do again soon.
2007-09-27 00:40:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You know, you may have a point! If he is above us, like we're above animals, that would be a form of zoophilia.
God must be kinky!
2007-09-27 00:37:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
... I hope the question does not get deleted; though rude, it's a valid question, and it does NOT personally attack anyone.
2007-09-27 00:36:58 · answer #10 · answered by SC 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋