Crestionists: Do you really have enough evidence to...?

Question

...declare all modern biology, geology, and paleontology, and most archeology, astrophysics and linguistics wrong?

Why would God put those millions of data points used by these fields there if he didn't want people to believe them?

Eh... 's' is right next to 'a' and my ring finger doesn't much like this tiny keyboard... Fun stuff.

Wow... A best answer is hard to pick here, Jolly Roger has the irony of explaining my typo in a sentence in which he has his own, Craigerz had a clever answer, JacksonKane deserves it for being extraordinarily stupid, dlockhart68 deserves it for asserting that a platypus named after Aldous Huxley made the universe the way it is, and THEN there's a couple good serious answers... I'm impressed.

Answer 1

they probably have enough evidence to spell

Answer 2

Yes--absolutely. Most of the various fields you mentioned all have a basic premise grounded in "naturalism" or evolution, which is to say, they have a "belief" that all things came to pass from natural and not super-natural causes. The only problem is, the very foundation of their argument is false---life cannot start by itself here or anywhere else in the universe, it is too complex for any amount of time and chance to have produced it so the only alternative is a supernatural beginning, which would be caused by God. People can dream up ideas of how things may have started all they want but it's only speculation and guesswork---not real science that is observable and testable. No one has ever produced a living organism from non-living material. Geologic age assertions are based on circular reasoning---the rocks date the fossils and the fossils date the rocks---no other dating method can acurately date a rock specimen to the milions or billions of years of supposed age.
The evidence for creation is the absolute impossibility of any other logical explaination. God has created a world and universe that explain a young age if you look closely and logically enough.

Answer 3

Funny thing , each of those sciences you mentioned make much more a case for creationism than evolution.

Biology - DNA, irreducible complexity, origin of life
Geology - None, not one single transitional forms ever found
Paleontology- Footprints of Men and Dinosaur together at Glenrose Texas.
Archeology - No historical fact in the Bible has ever been disproved by Archeology, many have been confirmed.
Astrophysics- At least 2 planets and six moons in our solar system spin backwards which could not happen according to the law of Conservation of Angular Momentum- proving the Big Bang Theory is a big dud.
Linguistics- Nothing in linguistics has ever supported macro evolution.

Therefore sir you have your facts wrong... Come to Christ

Answer 4

Evidence of the God Yahweh's knowledge of every field of science known and not yet known to man is clearly written,(if you know how to interpret it), in the first five books of The Bible. Where would you like to start?

Answer 5

God's millions of data points! Sounds like something the elder Bush would say!!!

Answer 6

I am the first of the non religious retards to reply to your post so im proud.

All of them only know how to criticize your spelling since they themselves know nothing about science at all.

The bible is a book, why don't these people treat other fictions this way. Maybe in a thousand years people will be praying to HARRY POTTER HAHAHAHAHA

Answer 7

He would have to have a weird sense of humor to plant all that evidence as a joke.
By the way, it's acceptable to take criticism of type-o's as an admission that the critic has no reasonable answer to your question

Answer 8

Of course they don't. They don't have evidence for anything. Evidence has no importance for them. They get tired of being asked about evidence, because they realize it's their achilles heel. They don't need evidence, they have "faith." And when scientific evidence becomes overwhelming they concoct the "creation museum", where......suddenly.....T-Rex becomes a plant eater. It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.

Answer 9

The scientists [are] an ideal scapegoat because they all [speak] in specialised languages and hardly anybody [can] understand them.

The Jews had served this function in earlier ages because they spoke Yiddish

The scientists [speak] mathematics.

Answer 10

These hypocrites are using the very fruits of science! They rely on modern medicine, appliances, transportation, etc. Hell, the computer on which they are spewing their ignorance was made through science.

Answer 11

God question, bad spelling, really bad answers. I guess that you've found out that Christians can spell but very easily deny facts.