English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't wish that anyone be sacrificed or suffer in my place for sins I have committed. I reject the "gift" of salvation and I will gladly enter hell, the JUST REWARD for my actions. From there I will praise omnipresent God who permeates hell as he does everywhere else. What do you think?

2007-09-26 06:13:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I don't reject mercy. I reject the sacrifice of an innocent on my behalf.

2007-09-26 06:27:52 · update #1

If God is not omnipresent, I will rejoice in his perfect justice from hell.

2007-09-26 06:30:04 · update #2

The truth of the matter and I'm sorry to break it to everyone is that Christians don't actually believe that they deserve eternal punishment for their sins which is why they are so willing to play the Jesus paid for my sins card. Being rational, they naturally reject the premise that sending them to suffer for eternity would be just.

2007-09-26 06:34:17 · update #3

7 answers

God is without sin and will therefore not be present in hell. He knows what will go on there though. You will know the difference between God being present and just watching from afar. Where God is not present, love does not exist. You say you willingly go to hell, I'm not so sure you mean that.

2007-09-26 06:22:08 · answer #1 · answered by VW 6 · 0 0

God is not omnipresent.

Why would you not accept a gift that would bring you joy? Yes, suffering for your mistakes is justice, but if someone extends you mercy, why reject it?

EDIT: If you reject a willing sacrifice on your behalf, then you reject mercy. That is the very definition of mercy. If you choose to reject mercy and would rather glory in the Justice of God from Hell, that is your decision and your right to exercise your free agency in that manner. I think it is foolish, but it is nonetheless your prerogative.

2007-09-26 06:21:11 · answer #2 · answered by Open Heart Searchery 7 · 0 0

I might desire to confess, that's an somewhat exciting question. As a Christian, i think that i'm not experiencing the "finished stress", with a view to speak, of God's presence whilst I stay out a temporal existence. The Holy Spirit is given as a seal; a assure of redemption, lest we start to doubt what has been promised to us. that's needed by way of fact we are actually unable to totally adventure God's presence in this state. have been we totally in God's presence in the worldwide, I think of it may be somewhat a distinctive adventure. possibly a extra useful definition is separation from the affection of God. You develop an excellent element on the topic of omnipresence. yet whilst God is able to, shrink His presence in the worldwide, one might desire to think of dialing it lower back to an insignificant spark in a area the place He has deemed it needed.

2016-11-06 10:29:06 · answer #3 · answered by moscovic 4 · 0 0

If you were experiencing the state of Hell you would not be rejoicing in but resentful of justice and you would bitterly be rejecting God's offer of mercy and forgiveness. The omnipotence of God would be one of the worst torments to those fleeing from Him.

2007-09-26 06:22:59 · answer #4 · answered by James O 7 · 0 0

Nothing. Hell is somewhere where God chooses to be absent from. That is why it is hell.Being cut odd from God for eternity is hell.

2007-09-26 06:17:52 · answer #5 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

He's Omipresent in heaven and earth, not in hell.

2007-09-26 06:16:46 · answer #6 · answered by papadego 3 · 0 1

Good point.

2007-09-26 06:16:34 · answer #7 · answered by Red 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers