He would think Christian Fundamentalists are mentally challenged for not believing in gravity.
2007-09-26 06:11:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Isaac Newton was a Jew!
He might be impressed with how the Christians treat and think of the Jews today, Especially the recently dead pope John Paul II.
2007-09-26 06:13:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Investor 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would be an Arianistic tv evangelist. A successful one at that. If he could get over the fact that the world didn't end with the millenium. Although, depending on which calendar he was using, maybe that date is still to come.
2007-09-26 06:09:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by fakesham43 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the King James Version Bible, First John 5:7 reads:
“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”
Using early Church writers, the Greek and Latin manuscripts and the testimony of the first versions of the Bible, Newton proved that the words “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one,” in support of the Trinity doctrine, did not appear in the original inspired Greek Scriptures. He then traced the way in which the spurious reading crept into the Latin versions, first as a marginal note, and later into the text itself. He showed that it was first taken into a Greek text in 1515 by Cardinal Ximenes on the strength of a late Greek manuscript corrected from the Latin. Finally, Newton considered the sense and context of the verse, concluding, “Thus is the sense plain and natural, and the argument full and strong; but if you insert the testimony of ‘the Three in Heaven’ you interrupt and spoil it.”4
Perhaps the best summary of Isaac Newton’s Scriptural arguments for his repudiation of the Trinity is found in fourteen ‘Argumenta,’ written in Latin, giving Bible citations for many of them. Numbers four to seven are particularly interesting:
“4. Because God begot the Son at some time, he had not existence from eternity. Proverbs 8:23, 25.
5. Because the Father is greater than the Son. John 14:28.
6. Because the Son did not know his last hour. Mark 13:32, Matt. 24:36, Rev. 1:1, 5:3.
7. Because the Son received all things from the Father.”18
A perusal of Newton’s religious writings cannot fail to impress the reader with their thoroughness, and a realization of his long and deep meditation, his scholarly ability and grasp of the original Bible languages. His conclusions regarding the Trinity therefore merit our respect and consideration, even though he did not feel constrained to make them public during his lifetime.
Today, when much more evidence is available than Newton had access to, we too should make investigation of our beliefs as he did, always seeking to reason first on the evidence of God’s Word. This will build in us a strong faith fully in harmony with the teaching of original Christianity.
Perhaps the best summary of Isaac Newton’s Scriptural arguments for his repudiation of the Trinity is found in fourteen ‘Argumenta,’ written in Latin, giving Bible citations for many of them. Numbers four to seven are particularly interesting:
“4. Because God begot the Son at some time, he had not existence from eternity. Proverbs 8:23, 25.
5. Because the Father is greater than the Son. John 14:28.
6. Because the Son did not know his last hour. Mark 13:32, Matt. 24:36, Rev. 1:1, 5:3.
7. Because the Son received all things from the Father.”18
A perusal of Newton’s religious writings cannot fail to impress the reader with their thoroughness, and a realization of his long and deep meditation, his scholarly ability and grasp of the original Bible languages. His conclusions regarding the Trinity therefore merit our respect and consideration, even though he did not feel constrained to make them public during his lifetime.
Today, when much more evidence is available than Newton had access to, we too should make investigation of our beliefs as he did, always seeking to reason first on the evidence of God’s Word. This will build in us a strong faith fully in harmony with the teaching of original Christianity.
What would Sir Isaac Newton think of Christianity today? Let's just say, he wouldn't like it.
2007-09-26 06:16:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by LineDancer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Issac Newton, when exposed to the vast amount of scientific knowledge accumulated since his time, would find the idea of religion to be untenable and no longer relevant.
2007-09-26 06:07:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm afraid he'd be considered a Pagan by most of today's Christians....that whole alchemy thing.... I think he'd not get along with them.
2007-09-26 06:04:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
He'd probably hitch a ride on the next spaceship off this planet.
2007-09-26 06:05:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not to be flip or anything, but since whatever his thoughts would be would have no impact whatsoever on my beliefs, I don't really care.
2007-09-26 06:07:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a scientist, I don't think he would be quick to judge. Most scientists are more open minded.
2007-09-26 06:03:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Master C 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
He might throw rotten apples at it.
Game on, bettierage, it's roaming time.
2007-09-26 06:10:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋