English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is no respect of persons with God & Son.
Even Herodians knew that much about God & Son
There's only respect of persons against God & Son.

2Chronicles 19:7 no iniquity with the LORD our God, nor respect of persons

Proverbs 24:23 not good to have respect of persons in judgment.

Proverbs 28:21 To have respect of persons not good

Matthew 22:16 the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any [man]: for thou regardest not the person of men.

Romans 2:11 there is no respect of persons with God.

Ephesians 6:9 neither is there respect of persons with him

Colossians 3:25 there is no respect of persons.

James 2:1 have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.

James 3:17 without partiality

1Peter 1:17 if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning in fear

2007-09-26 02:03:41 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

war is the solution to this...NOW TELL ME...IM WRONG!2bz.

2007-10-03 17:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I believe no matter how the Bible is analyzed, it is flawed When one controls the religion of a people, they then control those people. This is why it was so important to make sure the Bible only told the stories approved of by the King and his Church. It also explains the hiding of certain texts. If anything written even smells a little bit against the King, it was stricken and removed. Strictly discussing only the New Testament, it was written two centuries after Christ was murdered. This was long before translators made the Bible readable for the masses. They had complete discretion over content. Before being released to the masses If a story wasn’t complete, multiple stories were woven together to form one book. Pieces were moved around and put together like a puzzle. When a turn of a phrase disagreed with the King’s Church, it was, as previously mentioned removed in its entirety. We now know that multiple scrolls of material, intended to be included as part of the Bible, were carefully hidden instead. This was necessary to avoid destruction of both the authors, and the information. We are aware of this as scripted Codices, have slowly been discovered. They’ve been carbon dated and authenticated by experts to prove they were written at approximately the same time the Bible. Numerous experts believe these writings were intended to be part of the original Bible. However, it is also true to say that these compositions are still the cause of great debate. Before the Bible was let loose to commoners, these powerful people had just simply raped it. of freedom for the common man, it must be destroyed. For if it was found that the King was not god, the King could loose his ability to control his kingdom. As the translators were loyal to the King, the Bible was edited very carefully indeed. Speaking only of the New Testament, the Bible remains one of the very best set of life instructions known to man. There is only one, most important law. It is: To love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might, and to love thy neighbor as you love yourself. If this Law is followed to the letter, it isn’t possible to break even one of the old Ten Commandments. This is how we can live more abundantly, which is as God wants us to live. When Jesus was born, all prophecies from the Old Testament were fulfilled. The Old Testament passed away with the first coming of the Christ. The Ten Commandments were no longer relevant.
Blessed Be

2007-10-04 01:35:42 · answer #2 · answered by Linda B 6 · 0 0

Keep taking the medication.

2007-09-26 02:14:38 · answer #3 · answered by tentofield 7 · 0 1

........“I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”

Quote: -Robert McCloskey-

Thanks, RR

2007-09-26 02:12:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I missed the question in all that.

2007-09-26 02:27:16 · answer #5 · answered by Machaira 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers