Anti USA statements?

Question

I am appauled at the way others view America!
We are for Indepence, Democracy and Freedom!
Others wish to demegrate and degrade our president and freedome fighters who constantly fight for freedom and democracy and die without dignity!

What other country willfully invades another country to impose democracy and freedom to people living in a brutal dictatorship and oppression?

You sit back and watch as others die doing things you would never have the guts nor courage to do! You are cowards who do nothing to aid your country!

I despise you who do not support America and democracy!

I ask you again!
Are you with America and Democracy and Freedom, or are you against that way of life?

Answer 1

I am against LIARS.
Against Pedophilia.
Against Thieves.
Against immorality.
Against injustice.
DUBYA is for all the above and some.
Can you refute that?
Of course not!

Answer 2

We "sit back and watch as others dies?" If you are so appauled then why don't you step up and go fight in Bush's war? If you aren't too old, handicapped or have some other physical or mental ailment, then go sign up. Have your kids sign up too.

I am with America and Democracy and Freedom for the United States, not the rest of the world. Why don't you see any other countries out there helping us? They are smarter and would rather keep their nose out of the crazy Muslim's business.

Answer 3

Well,

I think the war is a fairly pragmatic effort to prevent Radical Islam from controlling too much of the world oil supply. Any improvements to Iraqi government are nice but not the central point.

On the other hand, the absolute commitment of the Left to American defeat has been truly appalling.

The easy willingness of the Left to lend de facto support to vicious intolerant Mosque bombing terrorists, for the sake of political victories at home saddens me greatly.

History is fairly clear on this one. Rome cannot fall to the barbarians without the help of Romans.

Answer 4

"What other country willfully invades another country to impose democracy and freedom to people living in a brutal dictatorship and oppression?"

no country actually does that.

take nicaragua, for example.

nicaraguan sandinistas made great strides in the area of human rights, literacy, and infant mortality. so much that the UN thought that they were a good model for progress in latin america.

this is all well and good for nicaraguans, but not for the american elite. the nicaraguans, you see, were socialists that did not want to trade with america.

well we couldn't have that! under the pretense that nicaragua was harboring terrorists (it wasn't unless you consider artists, engineers, and human rights activists "terrorists"), the united states launched a brutal assault on nicaragua by both funding contra terrorists and using a few of our own military aircraft. well, the sandinistas didn't particularly want to back down, and it turned into a bloody conflict that left thousands of nicaraguans dead. the country - its people, infrastructure, and economy were absolutely ruined. when president ortega finally resigned in 1990 after a decade of war, the united states media and its cronies (the uk, canada, etc.) called the campaign a roaring success against state-sponsored terror.

that might be a reason why some of the world doesn't quite trust america, by the way. sort of unfair to nicaragua, if you really look at it in an objective way (although i doubt you are able to).

anyway, some justice was served - ollie north, orchestrator of this terrorist campaign was indicted and served a few years. currently he has a program on fox news, if i remember right. maybe cnn. i can't keep track.

anyway, none of the "humanitarian interventionism" that the united states practiced in the 1970s - present was actually humanitarian - it all involved "official enemies" - islamists, marxists, socialists, etc. it did not matter if they were actually terrorizing their people or not - america made sure to do it for them anyway.

if america did in fact care about the world's population, certainly it would have done something about east timor, who, for 25 years, were decimated by homicidal and genocidal indonesian foreign policy. a small, brown, collectivist country of about 500,000 was reduced to about half that number after it was all over.

of course america did not care because they were brown, small, and collectivist. and plus, indonesia was pro-western and anti-communist. it would be bad for american business if we tried to stop them from raping the east timorians.

of course it got so bad that in 1999, due to protests and activism, the american press finally caught on and it shocked the entire united states. president clinton reluctantly told indonesia to stop and they promptly left.


as you can see, we do not engage in "freeing people" of any kind. if we accidently do free someone, we immediately support a brutal but pro-western tyrant that we can easily control.

i could go on and on about the abuses the world has suffered by american hands, but you probably haven't read this far anyway.

for more information about american foreign policy you can read a book about it. most any book will do. i recommend noam chomsky's "hegemony or suvival" but you can also choose from a variety of authors, all of them meticulously backed with proper sources that you can look up yourself if you don't believe it.


how's that for an anti-us statement?


edit: i am absolutely stupid. you are baiting people. okay mister, you win. this time.

Answer 5

What other country willfully invades another country to impose democracy and freedom to people living in a brutal dictatorship and oppression?

willfully invades another country to impose - I think this says it all right here.

You mean the same dictators that we ally with until it no longer serves our purpose.

You and the people that think like you need to seek mental help! Your thinking is dangerous to every man women and child in this country.

Answer 6

If you support this regime, then why don't you pack your bags and get on over to Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran to fight for freedom, take your pick. And take your children with you.
All of you neonuts can talk the talk. But chickenhawks that you all are, you can't walk the walk.

Answer 7

I'm with you....what also disgusts me is how one of our universities can invite a murdering dictator to speak yet kicks the Army ROTC off its campus...the ROTC that fights and dies to protect them from dictators like the one they asked to speak...the one who would line THEM up first and have shot....talk about idiots...

Answer 8

The democrats are traitors and own defeat.
And they need to stand trail for it.

1963 Communist Goals
The following was entered into the Congressional record by Albert Herlong, Jr. (a Floridian who served in Congress from 1949-69) in 1963.

1) US acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war
2) US willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war
3) Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the US would be a demonstration of "moral strength"
4) Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5) Extension of long term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites
6) Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination
7) Grant recognition of Red China, and admission of Red China to the UN.
8) Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the UN
9) Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the US has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress
10) Allow all Soviet Satellites individual representation in the UN
11) Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the UN as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo)
12) Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party
13) Do away with loyalty oaths
14) Continue giving Russia access to the US Patent Office
15) Capture one or both of the political parties in the US
16) Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism, and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in text books.
18) Gain control of all student newspapers
19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.
22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings", substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.
23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. " Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art".
24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present Homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy".
27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch"
28) Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state"
29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30) Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man".
31) Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture:" Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34) Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35) Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI
36) Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37) Infiltrate and gain control of big business
38) Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.
39) Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political, or social problems.
43) Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44) Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45) Repeal the Connally Reservation so the US can not prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Check http://www.glennbeck.com for more

Answer 9

I'm with ya.