Do you think big cities need more public transport instead of more private cars?

Answer 1

If you take public mass transportation in relation to one car each ... say two persons, and look at the pollution produced it is clear that public transportation is the lesser evil.
Sure subway lines, trains and buses are expensive but they can sustain themselves through fares and even through advertisement on the vehicles and/or stations.
The most economical version would be private companies to own public transportation facilities and even toll roads.
Some cities nowadays already start to increase their traffic free downtown areas which are only accessible through public transportation or by foot. This gives the opportunity to make the downtown a blossoming district without the usual pollution in those areas and prevent the migration of businesses and residents to suburban areas.

Answer 2

Yes. More reliable public transportation is better for everyone in the long run. It would create jobs and reduce pollution. Sure there are disadvantages, but the benefits outweigh them in my opinion.

Answer 3

yes but the public will only use it so much
ex public transit worker from NJ and a very densily populatred state
only the ones that wanted to use it would do it. not all
and it is a very expensive method of travel these days

Answer 4

it does not be virtually as handy as our own vehicles. i could hate to attempt to hold 4 baggage of groceries on a bus or van. Plus all the working stops we'd desire to make to the financial organisation, submit workplace and so on. i visit apply my own vehicle as long as that is obtainable.

Answer 5

Nah, they just need fewer people...