1. As wholes include you, you would be thought as part.
2. Since wholes include you, you would be thought as part.
3.You would be thought as part since wholes include you.
Which one is grammatically more appropriate?
2007-09-25 21:22:01 · 3 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Yes, it is #2: Since wholes include you, you would be thought as part. However, it actually is supposed to be "as part" and not "as a part" because it says "wholes" and not "a whole"
2007-09-25 21:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by ♥True love waits♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without regarding meaning for any of/for them, they are all grammatically proper. The norm for grammar is, it is grammatically correct or it is not, there is no measure system the grammar for a word expression, no more and less for grammar values.
4. As I include my self in wholes I am self thought as part.
5. As part of wholes I am in unity with the whole for which I am part. If I am not in unity with a whole, then I am not a part for that whole.
6. I am included in a whole but I am not including my self in that whole, I am for my self not as part for the unity in that whole; The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.
2007-09-26 22:51:43 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#2 proves to be the best, but change it to "...you would be thought as a part."
2007-09-26 04:28:17 · answer #3 · answered by caves51 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋