It is far more likely to be an "inside job." From a news report (via the Wikipedia article @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks#Anthrax_attack_bug_.22identical.22_to_army_strain_report ):
"The DNA sequence of the anthrax sent through the US mail in 2001 has been revealed and confirms suspicions that the bacteria originally came from a US military laboratory. The data released uses codenames for the reference strains against which the attack strain was compared. The two reference strains that appear identical to the attack strain most likely originated at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick (USAMRIID), Maryland. The new work also shows that substantial genetic differences can emerge in two samples of an anthrax culture separated for only three years. This means the attacker's anthrax was not separated from its ancestors at USAMRIID for many generations."
2007-09-25 18:23:38 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dean w: I'm not convinced by the claims that the government did 9/11, though the Anthrax thing is suspicious.
illicit_sandman: They are right-wing, but closer probably to the Birchers than to the Republicans.
George: Yes, anybody can edit Wikipedia, but every edit on high traffic articles is frequently checked for accuracy by numerous other editors and it is typically about as reliable as any other source.
Daniel L: From what I've read, the government appears to not be seriously investigating, just like they aren't seriously chasing Osama anymore.
honestamerican: If the anthrax attacks were (properly) investigated, we might just find out that Bush did it to scare the Democrats into going along with him.
What is suspicious is that the attacks were carried out with army-owned anthrax, with stereotypical "terrorist" notes, against the opposition and that they were hushed up pretty quick after they stopped and never seriously investigated (except for the NY Times defaming somebody).
2007-09-25 20:59:06 · update #1
Everything is a conspiracy. We're all in on it. We are tracing your account as we speak.
2007-09-25 18:30:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
The Anthrax DNA you are taking about was sent to the wrong adress by mistake and was kept there by accident and soon was forgotten about. Not sure really why it was. And besides its easier to createa vaccination to Anthrax than it is easier to control a terroristic attack.
2007-09-25 19:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by acot_anthonym 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Going to war and killing it's own citizen...for what reason? Money? There are easier ways of getting money. There must be something bigger than money to make these people do what they are doing........that is of course this is all true. But so far these amateur researchers fail to give any concrete evidence. They just seem to only take what they read all the time.
I also like to mention that I find it funny that this government carries out such a complicated 9/11 scheme and yet can't even carry out an antrax attack... and even have their "government controlled" media tell everybody that it was an inside job. That doesn't make any sense.
2007-09-25 18:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by mishmallow8 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Dean, please don't include me in your loony bin mindset. The overwhelming majority of people know 9/11 was not an inside job.
As for this, interesting question. I wonder why the anthrax problem went away right after the wrong man was arrested. After that, nothing was ever brought up about it again. I'd like to know where the investigation is going and what they know.
2007-09-25 18:35:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Anthrax scare was used to push congress to pass the patriot act.
Science has proven that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB
www.journalof911studies.com
2007-09-25 18:32:56 · answer #5 · answered by jflsdkjflsad 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
The thing I find most interesting about the "Truther"movement is that it's most vocal proponents,Alex Jones,Webster Tarpley,and Jeff Rense.are all far right wing extremists,yet the 9/11 conspiracy movement is labeled as a "liberal" movement.Why is that?Who's in who's pocket here?
Guess I got my own conspiracy theory.
2007-09-25 18:28:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because they are two separate incidents.
However it is curious that it was only people who might oppose the administration who were targeted by the anthrax terrorist!
2007-09-25 18:36:51 · answer #7 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wiki?, PLEASE!
You believe what you read there? I have a bridge and some prime Florida real estate you might be interested in.
Wait! if you're really this stupid you don't have any money...never mind.
2007-10-03 10:08:35 · answer #8 · answered by vfa25 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe because 9/11 killed thousands of innocent people.
And all the evidence was taken out of the country and melted
pretty darn fast.
The Bin laden family was in America on 9/11
They were one of the only flights allowed to leave the country on the day all flights were grounded
2007-09-25 18:37:10 · answer #9 · answered by mw 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
man EVERY one knows 9/11 is a american Inside Job. Anthrax was just to keep peolpe scared by the goverment.
2007-09-25 18:27:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Why don't you just crawl back underneath your rock!
2007-09-26 15:55:32 · answer #11 · answered by token1112 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋