Or possibly Lenin?
I'm not really sure. To me she seems to waver between Trotskyism and Maoism.
My friend says that she's a Leninist. I don't really see evidence of that. If she's a Maoist, I'm not voting for her.
2007-09-25 17:03:17 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can tell she's not a Marxist or a Stalinist. She doesn't seem much like Pol Pot either. The only thing my friends and I seem to agree upon is that she comes from some branch of socialism and communism. Can you help me figure out which? Please provide evidence.
2007-09-25 17:10:06 · update #1
As much as I dislike her, go blow it out your.... Hillary has betrayed her base, supported Bush on everything he asked for, went along with the murder of 1,000s of Troops, she is so far from the left, your statement shows you wouldn't know Lenon from pee wee herman..
2007-09-25 17:20:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is an idiotic question.
I can't stand Hillary Clinton but she is not a socialist or a communist. Would Rupert Murdoch (the owner of FOX News) host a fundraiser dinner for a communist???
Please look up Communism in a text and save the rest of us some time.
2007-09-26 00:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by cattledog 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
None of the above. Hillary was a Barry Goldwater girl, and that's where her political roots lie. Nobody is buying this socialist/communist crap where Hillary's concerned except those of you reguritating it to each other like a bunch of parrots.
2007-09-26 00:15:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Possibly she is a human being. Lets just hope she's not a Fascist pig like we have now. Corporations running everything. I'm going with the Edwards/Obama ticket....
Sorry for not using your suggestions on which to label her.
2007-09-26 00:12:23 · answer #4 · answered by Dirty Mutt 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
If you had any education at all on the subject, you would know that she has much more in common with GW Bush than any of those others you mentioned.
Source: Her voting record.
Next!
2007-09-26 00:15:34 · answer #5 · answered by obl_alive_and_well 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mao. She's very strongly socialist. Socialist medicine, socialist child care, socialist military, socialist censorship of media (her alliance with Rick Santorum, a very conservative Rep. on video game censorship)- she's the most socialist major American politician of my lifetime. A lot of Americans like that and will vote for her. Many people believe that the government should own everything and make everyone's life choices for them. It's called the "nanny state." The assumption is that people are too stupid to make their own choices about health, finances, and their general welfare.
2007-09-26 00:11:55 · answer #6 · answered by slushsledelephant 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Let's see, she is for peace, prosperity, equality and the Constitution.
And the comparison is - what? - again?
2007-09-26 00:13:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Please, PLEASE PLEEEEEEEASE, stop this nonsense.You know very well she is neither, you are making a fool of yourself just as all the Republicans trying to only do what they do best for their opponent:
Throw mud with negative and scary tactics
2007-09-26 00:15:52 · answer #8 · answered by The_last_Amazona 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What ever label you want to use for her ( Stalinist, Marxist, Maoist, Leninist, socialist ect.) she's just plain bad for America.
Stephen
2007-09-26 00:12:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋
well being a new york senator i'd definitely have to say trotsky. because we all know how much the new york jews love trotsky. just with a little lesbian witch thrown in on the side.
2007-09-26 00:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by chad k 2 · 0⤊ 6⤋