2007-09-25 16:32:36 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No lies...so the premise of your question is false.
2007-09-29 03:19:30 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't care even a little about Iraq's unemployment rate, their electricity or lack thereof, or anything else about it. We should not be in Iraq because it was unconstitutional for us to be there in the first place. Iraq and the rest of the middle east can go to hell.
2007-09-25 16:41:14 · answer #2 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You could tell me who lied and when. I was around in the 90s when every Democrat was supporting the removal of Saddam, even going so far as passing a resolution to that effect. considering that 99% of the Intel used was gathered during the Clinton years it makes me wonder who really was telling lies.
2007-09-25 16:38:54 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
According to the Senate Intelligence Committee report, and Joe Wilson's report, there were no lies told .
2007-09-25 16:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by madd texan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We fired 400,000 of their public service workers in one day, you know, those wacky guys who do things like run the power and water services.
So I'd say it's at least that much higher, if not more.
2007-09-25 16:51:43 · answer #5 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the republicans and democrats were both in favor of war. why? because they would not grant full access to the united nations inspectors. hinting that they were hiding weopens of mass destruction. now, when are you going to stop telling lies? both parties wanted war. now, thats what i call an "inconvenient truth".
2007-09-25 16:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
42%
2007-09-29 16:30:09 · answer #7 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you get your evidence straight, opps, I noticed you have none.
2007-09-25 16:39:30 · answer #8 · answered by lilly4 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋