1) Ted Kennedy sending a secret letter to Russia during the Cold War.
2) Liberals inviting Iran's president to speak at a U.S. university. That action will only fuel Iran's anti-American propaganda which will result in more dead soldiers in Iraq. Liberals already knew the speech would be broadcast to hundreds of millions of people in the Middle East.
3) Liberals wanting to remove the embargo on Cuba.
4) Clinton passing military secrets to communist China. A country that has said that war with the U.S. is unavoidable and is preparing for it. Clinton's action put America at risk for a nuclear attack from communist China.
5) Liberals helping Russia after WW2. An American liberal gave Russia secret American nuclear weapons plans. Russia then gave the plans to China in the 1960's. China then gave the plans to North Korea and to a man in Pakistan. The man in Pakistan then gave the plans to Iran. Also, Chinese nuclear bomb plans were found in Libya's nuclear program
2007-09-25
16:23:24
·
24 answers
·
asked by
a bush family member
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
A liberal gave nuclear plans to Russia. Fact.
U.S. government links:
http://www.ncix.gov/
http://www.ncix.gov/issues/CI_Reader/Vol2/Vol2Chap4.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol46no4/article09.html(( USSR's leader Nikita Khrushchev's own memoirs references the importance of Liberal's stolen U.S. documents. On a side note, Nikita Khrushchev was also the USSR leader involved in the Cuban missile crisis. )
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/venona/images/inte_intercept_rg1.gif
2007-09-25
16:36:54 ·
update #1
Clinton helped China. Fact.
Clinton took money from China. Clinton also gave U.S. military secrets to China. That action put the U.S. at risk for a nuclear missile attack from China. Two foreigners pled guilty but for some reason they didn't go to jail. Also, China secretly helped fund Bill Clinton's legal defense. Democrat politicians don't want the public to know the real facts about Clinton and China.
This is a few of some of the U.S. government's documents.
http://www.senate.gov/~govt-aff/20.pdf
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/1999/May/213crm.htm
http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/18.pdf
http://www.rules.house.gov/archives/rules_burt04.htm
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Al6t0RPkB9J_fwwG.2jFgu4jzKIX?qid=20070706154634AAJxjxe
2007-09-25
16:39:20 ·
update #2
Iran is sending forces into Iraq.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2002851080_iran08.html
2007-09-25
16:41:11 ·
update #3
Iran goes into Iraq's waters.
March 9, 2006
"An Australian frigate was involved in a tense stand-off with six Iranian gunboats while guarding Iraq's oil platforms in the Gulf on Saturday..."
http://smh.com.au/news/world/rumsfeld-warns-of-incursions-after-australians-repel-guards/2006/03/08/1141701579928.html
2007-09-25
16:42:17 ·
update #4
IRAN BOMBS SOLDIERS IN IRAQ.
"Blair warns Iran over Iraq bombs
British Prime Minister Tony Blair has issued a warning to Iran, saying "information" linked it to recent bomb attacks on British troops in Iraq. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4315924.stm
Iraq bombs 'clearly from Iran'
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/10/iran.iraq/
2007-09-25
16:43:14 ·
update #5
The liberals hate America, that is, any America that doesnt fit their vision of America.
2007-09-25 16:27:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
6⤋
The fact that, as you state, this society has great freedoms is the reason that a diverse and policitally opinionated citizenry can still be united under one flag. We liberals seek a better society, one where those freedoms are not given over to an authority built on fear. As for playing nice with the enemy, that's what subtle rulers all over the world have done to advance their own agenda. We tolerated Stalinist Russia during the 2nd WW because they were the enemy of the Axis and "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". That changed rapidly as soon as the war was over - we entered a long period of covert hostilities with Communism. As for our relationship with Hitler, it was the very liberal government of FDR that worked with the European powers to obliterate Hitler. Long before the conservative American public was willing to take on the German, Italian and Japanese forces, Roosevelt tapped George Marshall to work with Churchill to bolster their war effort. Please also remember the great effort that one of your own, Richard Nixon, made to play nice with an enemy (this is called diplomacy, by the way). He has the world's admiration for opening the door to trade with China. Without that effort, they might be an enemy the like of which we've never seen. Instead, they are now trading partners. I don't want to leave the Middle East until we have a peaceful solution to the immense problems there, but I don't believe that what we're currently doing works. That makes me very afraid. Very afraid. But I'd rather be afraid of terrorists, than of my own government. And the liberties that are being slowly leached away by the current administration are harder to replace than lose.
2016-05-18 22:36:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
1/20/1981 - 1/20/1989 Vice President George Bush Sr.
1/20/1989 - 1/20/1993 President George Bush Sr.
1/20/1993 - 1/20/2001 President Bill Clinton
1/20/2001 –currently President George Bush, Jr.
Now if Hillary Clinton becomes president we will effectively been controlled by two families for at least 32 years. Amazingly, George Bush and the Clinton’s are close friends or is that amazing?
I find this more worriesome than anything else.
2007-09-25 16:50:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Twilight 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
The radical left wing liberalism that we see today is really social liberalism. With its roots over a century old, this type of liberalism presupposes that people can not attain liberty unless they attain a certain measure of health welfare and lack of poverty. It views the state as the entity that can best alleviate the individual from his burdens so that he can attain personal liberty. Therein lies the trap. One must continually relinquish more and more of his individual freedom to the state in order for the state to provide for society's needs. This can be seen around the world in various socialist nations throughout history. This, however, has not been the model that the United States has followed. So, the "liberal" feels a kindred spirit with these socialist states.
2007-09-25 16:48:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
The very essence of a liberal is "self" loathing...self's race, self's country, self's wealth, self whatever...it's sort of a perverted self hatred which the bleeding hearted liberal projects on everything the bleeding hearted liberal is a part of.
Thus the bleeding hearted liberal hates the nation that alone can support the bleeding hearted liberal socialist agenda, because it takes capitalism to be able to fund socialist programs. Without capitalism, you get the USSR all over again, or Cuba, or China...abject poverty for 99%, wealth for the elite.
The bleeding hearted liberal hates the military that fought for the rights that the bleeding hearted liberal now takes for granted, but the bleeding hearted liberal will put on his/her sandals to march against the same military fighting to give that right to another population or to keep secure the bleeding hearted liberal's right to put on his/her sandals to march. The bleeding hearted liberal celebrates when a member of the military is blown to bits, as I witnessed personally on many occasions at the bleeding hearted liberal university which I attend.
I could go on, but that's enough about the perversity and abject intellectual poverty of the bleeding hearted liberal US citizen.
2007-09-25 16:51:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by dagiffy 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Because they are the same ***** who will put you in jail for killing the guy that broke into your house, raped your wife and daughter, killed them both, then stole everything you own, and burned your house down. Just THINKING about liberals makes me angry beyond proper description. I saw a bumper sticker once that said "Liberals are people who are so open minded, their brains have fallen out." Anyone who can't agree is a stupid ignorant less-than-human piece of ****. These people wipe their asses on glass to save paper, wear plastic to save animals and convict the victim because the criminal has rights. It's all about "rights" anymore. If you are doing something that no one likes, it is because you have been deprived of your "rights", so we must give them back to you. If i had a chance to meet several powerful liberal pricks i would beat their faces in till i broke my hands.
2007-09-30 10:22:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by OMT LW 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
The bushes are friends with the Saudis where 15/19 hijackers hailed from reagan and Rumsfeld armed Bin Laden and Hussein Reagan dealt arms to Iran and arranged for hostages to be released adter election and Bush sr's ambassdor green lighted Kuwait invaision
2007-09-25 16:29:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
1. We were not at war with the USSR
2. We are not at war with Iran
3. This is childish bullying. We do not have such an embargo against China or Vietnam. Cuba is not a threat to us and the embargo is as harmful to Cubans as communism is.
4. Please provide sources.
5. This is a self serving argument - you seem to be defining anyone you dislike as a liberal. Pro communists in the 1950s were not liberals.
I'm just wondering why neo-cons do not want to catch the only person who has coordinated attacks on us recently. Why is catching Bin Laden not important anymore - he is the enemy (sure I know he was your friend when you funded and trained him 30 years ago but I thought you had admitted that was a mistake and now wanted him - until Dubya called off the search in 2002).
Or for that matter how they can accuse Liberals of siding with our enemies when most of those enemies were armed by Reagan.
2007-09-25 16:37:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
2⤊
8⤋
Freedom is dangerous and can be messy. It is so much easier to just roll over and let the government tell you what to do. Then you don't have to take responsibility for our mistakes.
2007-09-25 16:27:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
7⤊
0⤋
1. Without proof, that is at best a lie.
2. And what happened there? His ideas were shown the light of day and found severely wanting. He was introduced as a petty dictator. He was roundly booed and even mocked.
3. See #1
4. See #1
5. See #1
I sided with the US Navy for six years. Where did you serve?
2007-09-25 16:30:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
2⤊
5⤋
You forgot CARTER'S desperate plea to the Soviets for help in beating Reagan. He said that it was in their interest to help him defeat Regan. Thats not hearsay, its a fact. Its one of the amazing things to be revealed once the soviet archives were opened.
Also, the majority of 911 nuts are leftists.
2007-09-25 16:29:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by 911 Nut 1
·
8⤊
2⤋