English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Let's make two assumptions that may be false, just for the sake of time. The policies of Bush and the three candidates you name are almost identical, and that those policies are good for America.

Any of those three would be better than Bush for the following two reasons.

1. A fresh start. The new President would start of with a higher approval rating than Bush's current 30%ish. Therefore, with a stronger mandate from the people, he might be able to push through more legislation.

2. A better speaker. While some people short-change Bush in terms of his mental prowess, he does not articulate a vision very well. He delivers a pretty good speech, and his people try to portray him as a straight shooter. However, I'm a little tired of hearing, "It's hard work." when the talks focus on Iraq. I think the three candidates above are better at answering questions and thinking on their feet than Bush.

2007-09-25 15:46:51 · answer #1 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 2 0

The wouldn't be any better than George Bush. They are all neo con puppets just like Bush. Only Ron Paul would be better.

2007-09-25 22:41:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I don't believe they would be much if any better. I'm not sure who I will vote for in the primaries but it won't be one of these three. We need someone who sees the truth about the mess we are in.

2007-09-26 00:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If they send their children to Iraq to help with the War effort.

2007-09-25 22:38:56 · answer #4 · answered by bobanalyst 6 · 3 0

I don't believe that they would be alot better. For God's sake...Bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran???....$9.11 support dinner and a call from the wife while addressing the NRA???...Mr. hairdo who does not believe in evolution????

roflmfao...the least of the Dem candidates far eclipse this group of neanderthals.

2007-09-25 22:47:40 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas B 3 · 2 2

Just look at the libs they are running against

2007-09-25 22:40:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

How would Hillery Clinton be better?

2007-09-25 22:49:33 · answer #7 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1 3

because any one would be better

2007-09-25 22:51:54 · answer #8 · answered by JOHN 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers