No.
Since she didn't intend for the pics to hit the net, and it was her personal business in the first place (they were only meant for Zac Efron), Disney backs her up 100%.
2007-09-25 13:53:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~JennyBunny~ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Vanessa Hudgens didnt get kicked off the Disney channel. Vanessa remains with Disney. she will have the flexibility to reprise her place in HSM3. Vanessa would be back alongside with the different solid contributors for HSM3.
2016-10-19 23:48:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No she didn't. Because befroe the incident with the photographs every costar was deemed therre spots for high school musical 3 (which will air in theatres) but if there are anymore incidents she will be kicked off and they will replace her w/ a cheetah girl where troy meets someone else.
2007-09-25 14:13:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
she didnt get kicked off by disney channel
or from disney channel
many peole think she did because of the nude pic
but thats not true
2007-09-25 13:49:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jona 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
no she didnt get kicked off of it, but there are naked pictures of her on the internet, and disney channel says that she did the right thing by saying shes sorry about it, but i do believe she is becoming sued for something
and i heard she is dating zach effron
2007-09-25 13:49:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
idk if she was completely kicked off disney channel but i kno she will not be in hsm 3 because she sent nude pix of her to her boyfriend zac and somehow it ended up all over the net and zacs not gina be in it either cuz he's in a nudist magazine plus he was part of the whole vannessa thing hope that answers it byby
2007-09-25 13:57:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Boff Girl 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
There thinking about it....
She sent naked pictures to Zac Efron and they got on the internet.
2007-09-25 13:47:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no she wasn't and i read a news that Vanessa,Ashley,Zac,Corbin signed for the HSM 3
2007-09-25 14:23:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's wrong
2016-07-30 03:53:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't believe that is correct
2016-09-19 23:15:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋