English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

DUH you tell us!~!

2007-09-25 12:58:33 · answer #1 · answered by Hunter 4 · 0 3

Liberals aren't communists. Some are. Some are socialists. Some are both. Some are the valuable and true liberals described in the dictionary.

I am a democrat. Not a liberal, not a socialist. Some fight the Patriot Act because they fear the power it gives the state to take away our rights (whether it is true or not, necessary in war time or not).
It has always been our task to protect our rights. It is the primary interest of democrats.

I do wonder at the motives of others in the party, who seem to not care about anything but being "anti-republican". Class and race division are essential to a socialist take-over, and it is important that we do everything we can to remove political bigotry by simply being intolerant of it.

Then, no matter what socialist or communists do, they will not be able to split us apart.

I would rather stand with Republicans than tolerate socialists.

How about you folks?

2007-09-25 13:02:32 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0 1

Blah blah...liberal vs conservative, democrat vs republican...this two party system is boring. America's politics are very tiresome. The largest "third party" is the Libertarian party and most people aren't aware of what it stands for. How sad. So to answer your question, the two party system is to blame. If Amerikans would bother moving beyond this retarded two party system there would be room for communists and socialists and fascists in the political system. Until then, one side will just resort to calling the other side communist or fascist as a derogatory epithet since no real communists or fascists exist in the amerikan political arena.

2007-09-25 13:03:20 · answer #3 · answered by practical thinking 5 · 0 0

Savage was on the right track when he opined "liberalism is a mental disorder". only a neo-lib would make that comparison.

Some day the lies from the far-left will catch up to them, I can only imagine the New Your Times will defend them, NBC (Narcissistic Bull Crap) will forge more documents. George Soros will take out another full page add at the 'discount' rate bashing the truth once again. People.

2007-09-25 13:13:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

final time I checked, the patriot act would not get rid of the main dazzling to endure hands. What it does do is supplies the government the main dazzling to seek somebody's domicile all at once them first. modification IV the main dazzling of the folk to be take care of of their persons, homes, papers, and outcomes, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall concern, yet upon probable reason, supported via oath or confirmation, and somewhat describing the situation to be searched, and the persons or issues to be seized. word it says probably reason. The Patriot act searches human beings in the event that they have probable reason that they seem to be a terrorist, not by way of fact they sense like it.

2016-11-06 09:13:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, "the line it is drawn" and "the curse it is cast". You are either for defending the Constitution or you are against it. The people are watching you Democrats. As George W. Bush, whom you protect through your inaction on impeachment, has said, "Americans are rising to the tasks of history, and they expect the same of us." Ladies and gentlemen of the House and Senate, the people are rising to the task that is required to defend the U.S. Constitution. Be forewarned. If you are not with us then you are against us, and we are against you. We will replace you. And when justice is served, make no mistake about it, you will be held accountable.

The prosecution [of impeachments], will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust, and they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself. -- Alexander Hamilton

2007-09-25 12:58:57 · answer #6 · answered by somber 3 · 1 0

Because the Patriot Act does not sponsor or promote a police state, it's a bill designed to protect Americans from terrorists. The Patriot Act does not provide socialised medicine, food, 4 hour work days, or any other communist idealogy.

2007-09-25 12:59:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Where did you come from? Liberals are Communists? Wow.

2007-09-25 12:59:49 · answer #8 · answered by Zeta Lyrae 1 · 1 0

It's so those nasty liberals can call terrorist in other countries and not be listened to so they can get their talking points to be used during elections to fire up their base of traitors. Just a guess, but I'm probably right, you think?

2007-09-25 13:16:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You won't get a cogent argument from the thuglicans here brother they're not capable of one

Now name calling like little boys on a schoolyard they do quite well but that's the extent of their prowess

2007-09-25 13:01:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Obviously because we are trampling all over the rights of the poor islamic terrorists and preventing them from murdering millions of Amerinazi's.

2007-09-25 13:11:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers