2007-09-25 12:34:22 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The same as the rest of us...nothing. The question is flawed, as you assume that mankind can make a difference about an issue controlled by the Lord.
2007-09-25 13:15:07 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Me 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The Democratic candidates all have plans to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. The best plan in John Edwards', which proposes an 80% greenhouse gas reduction by 2050, which is what scientists recommend to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
There are details about each Democratic candidate's environmental plans at the link below, including interviews with them on the issue.
http://grist.org/feature/2007/07/06/candidates/
From the info on this page I'd rank them as follows:
1. Edwards
2. Richardson
3. Gravel
4. Kucinich
5. Dodd
6. Clinton
7. Biden
8. Obama
As usual, the Republicans are weak to bad on the environment in general.
2007-09-26 04:39:58 · answer #2 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
At least even the White House now admits that the problem is caused by Man. Even Standard oil and Exxon hav admitted it too. The evidence is so overwhelming that they started to be embarrassed by the obvious idiocy of their own propaganda.
There are still a few brain-dead people who won't admit it but they are outnumbered by the flat-earthers at this point.
2007-09-26 05:19:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Ask them. Then read their lips when they answer.
At least the White House has finally admitted that global warming is human caused. But they still maintain that the world is flat and sits on the backs of three gigantic elephants.
2007-09-25 13:07:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Same as the rest of us. Bend over and kiss their butts goodbye. We'll be polar bear hunting in Death Valley before we get any unified action on global warming.
2007-09-25 12:44:03 · answer #5 · answered by socrates 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I hope they demand that any further treaty's or international law not grant exceptions, like Kyoto, for massive pollution creators like China and others. We are most likly not going to see anything but manipulation of the situation to raise tax's and fees to grow toward a more socialist government.
2007-09-25 12:52:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Most likely nothing as long as oil companies have great influence via lobbying.
2007-09-25 12:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by charlieshepp 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I've researched all of the candidates and found that the one that has the strongest stance on this issue is Dennis Kucinich..
You can go to his main page and read about what he plans to do :)
2007-09-25 13:05:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
You mean like Al Bore driving his big cars and flying around in private jets
2007-09-25 13:09:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
If Hillary or B.O. are elected the same as Bush - NOTHING. We just won't hear about it, the Press will play it down if we have a Democrat President.
2007-09-25 12:46:52 · answer #10 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋