:)
2007-09-25 12:25:35 · 22 answers · asked by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Dsdsd S have to dissapoint you...have a nice day :)
2007-09-25 12:53:57 · update #1
Baba Yaga! You gave it away you!
2007-09-25 12:56:01 · update #2
No. How would equal treatment do that?
2007-09-25 12:32:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
It might, a true state of gender equality would mean the large chunk of men who 'just dont get it', would need to somehow be persuaded or educated. Since men are (mostly) born bigger, stronger and less emotional then Women, men will always suffer the allusion that they are therefore better - while that logic might have been true 1000years ago, it really is equivilant to a type of fundamentalism, as those masculine capabilities are already replaced/replacible with machines.
So how to convince men that we arent still in the middle ages? Education at the minumum, and if they still dont get it then perhaps legislation will need to be uneven against men to support an enforced equality to compensate for the physical imbalance of males who do not believe in the state of equality.
2007-09-25 13:01:20 · answer #2 · answered by tacs1ave 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Each time a society opts for a more just model of organization things change, just for an example: Abolition of slavery did change a lot, so did the civil rights movement, or the end of children's work. These changes did not change enough to make the society as a whole unrecognizable or ended civilization, they just made the world a somewhat nicer place to inhabit. - I expect feminism will have just the same effect.
2007-09-25 12:39:28 · answer #3 · answered by LGM 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
What is true feminism and what do you mean by the 'end of civilization'? The question is rather vague and can be interpreted in many ways.
2007-09-25 12:36:37 · answer #4 · answered by Fortis cadere cedere non potest 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"True" feminism? The end of civilisation as we know it? This is more and more sounding like a bad B movie! LOL!!
2007-09-26 04:07:06 · answer #5 · answered by celtish 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
some people might not know the actual values behind it or the consequences of it
however as long as its not for any ones interest and there is no one taking it as an excuse for their actions or advantages i would say no other wise i would say yes
2007-09-29 12:24:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because anti feminists are going to put a stop to it. And once it has been stopped free thinking men and women will finally be able to put the feministic falsehoods and hatred of men behind us and repair the damage feminism created.
2007-09-25 20:38:53 · answer #7 · answered by Chevalier 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
End of Western civilization, yes.
2007-09-25 16:09:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its corruption of intellectual rigor and discipline certainly help to nudge Western civilization along to its destruction.
Civilization, as opposed to culture, depends on certain principles held as transcendent and transpersonal, in order to regulate people's behavior with strangers. Feminism promotes a notion of truth that is particular, subjective, and arbitrarily constructed (unless that "truth" is a feminist principle or finding).
Feminism's postmodernist doctrines undermine the intellectual foundations of civilization worthy of the name, while playing fast-and-loose with epistemology ("our truth is true, but yours is constructed') undermines the institutional trust required for good-faith participation of citizens.
2007-09-25 13:14:40 · answer #9 · answered by G-zilla 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
True humanism doesn't. Any ideology, in it's purest form is not bad. Textbook Economic Anarchy(Free Markets) is good, in it's purest form.
2007-09-25 13:02:35 · answer #10 · answered by Nep 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The idea sounds scary to me. I dont think so. Just more divorces, radical ladies rights movements and alot more chaos.
2007-09-26 06:23:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋