These guys put their lives on the line for America every day. They are true patriots in every sense of the word. Shouldn't we listen to them, don't we owe them that for what they did for our Nation?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm
September 23, 2007 – Seven CIA veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and have called for a new investigation. “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke,” said Raymond McGovern, 27-year veteran of the CIA, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates during the seventies. “There are a whole bunch of unanswered questions. And the reason they’re unanswered is because this administration will not answer the questions,” he said. McGovern, who is also the founder of VIPS (Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity), is one of many signers of a petition to reinvestigate 9/11.
2007-09-25 12:00:43 · 14 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
With tongue firmly planted in cheek I ask... Don't these guys read Popular Mechanics?
According to Ruppert's Fox-Tox news and opinionators like Hannity, O'Reilley et al- Popular Mechanics has decidedly PROVEN that 9/11 happened just as Fox says.
Does it surprise anyone that Ruppert also owns Popular Mechanics?
Despite my misgivings about the CIA I say welcome to:
Pilots for 9/11 truth
Architects for 9/11 truth
Engineers for 9/11 truth
Veterans for 9/11 truth; and last but not least...
Americans for 9/11 truth
2007-09-25 17:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by anyusmoon1 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the administration answered some of the legitimate questions concerning the 9/11 masscre it would expose their direct involvement in planning, executing, and covering-up, the events of that day. It would then lead to the exposure of many cover-ups and lies over the last 100 years. Government that started out as a Constitutional Republic, then was perverted to a Democracy, and tearfully now is an oligarchy. If you are new to the concept that the government might be lying to you. There is a good free video you could start your research free right now live on the net
www.zeitgeistmovie.com
Love To All
2007-09-25 12:15:31 · answer #2 · answered by Kenneth E 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Most likely they got snookered by the outright lies that you find on the internet about 9/11 being an "inside job." However, what 7 CIA guys think is not relevent compared to all the published opinions of scientists & experts, which say it was not an inside job. I looked at the link about these guys. They are well known conspiracy advocates & written a lot on the subject. Some of these guys are making the same old incorrect scientific arguments about the collapse & the pentagon. Real scientists have already settled this debate.
2016-04-06 01:03:43 · answer #3 · answered by Barbara 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to revise my answer to make it clearer.
The fact that 7 CIA people want a new investigation of 9-11 doesn’t mean anything when you consider that perhaps 5 or 10 thousand people work for the CIA. I assume a lot of these 10,000 people are happy with the 9/11 investigation, and I could just as easily have argued that 9,993 CIA people DON’T want a new investigation. So, the CIA business means nothing.
What we have is 7 people who want a new investigation and I’m guessing 9,993 who don’t. Obviously, conjectural, but 7 is a real small number.
Also, some of their claims are old, discredited technical arguments: Reading the link, one of them (Christison) says the towers couldn’t fall by jets alone, the pentagon wasn’t hit by a plane. These arguments have been discredited in the published scientific literature years ago, utterly, completely.
These 7 people are actually well-known conspiracy theorists (it’s in the link you provided). They belong to such organizations as “Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity”. Others, Christison and Baer, endorsed David Griffins outrageous book on 9/11. One of them, Mc Govern, hates Bush & returned an award he received to Bush. Is he impartial about 9/11?
All in all, you’re just saying that there are 7 people who are conspiracy theorists. Not very impressive. In the CIA, as I said, I’m, guessing a lot of people disagree with these 7.
2007-09-25 12:41:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why would anyone question 9/11, unless they read the commission report. Then they might figure it out. many questions surround 9/11 and it's a patriots duty to question it! dare i remind you "It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government." - Thomas Paine
2007-09-25 12:06:13 · answer #5 · answered by jeb black 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
These guys were in the agency under Carter, That should explain it all. Another multimillion dollar "investigation" that would prove nothing and try to drag in all the conspiracy theories floated by the loony left since the attack.
2007-09-25 16:57:54 · answer #6 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because they think that Clinton was involved.
Sandy Berger stole & destroyed Classified Documents to protect Bill Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
(Now why would Berger do that??????)
2007-09-25 12:20:35 · answer #7 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
There is involvement at many levels with the most sinister being the Arabs and Bush. On Sept 11 the look on Bush's face said it all!
2007-09-25 12:14:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Wait until the Democrats take over the Presidency, and get a workable majority in Congress, and all these unanswered questions will be answered.
If that by itself is not a compelling reason to vote Democrat, nothing is.
2007-09-25 12:28:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
It would be nice. They should also re-open the Oklahoma bombing. These 'false flag' allegations need to be investigated to the fullest extent. However, the obvious reason that they WOULDN'T be investigated is that someone in a position of power doesn't want the truth to come out.
For those of you that call me 'conspiracy boy', or other names, think about this.
Kenneth Starr spent MILLIONS looking into Clinton's sex life. Don't we deserve that same kind of exhaustive investigation into the worst terrorist attack on our country?
2007-09-25 12:08:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋