Yes, that's the road that socialism takes you. Most European countries are hurting as a result, yet time and time again, they have been used on this forum as examples of where we should be heading. HA!
2007-09-25 10:13:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
What has bankrupted France isn't their social programs, it's the very anti-business climate that could generate revenues and additional taxes. There has to be a balance. Swedan, Norway and other European countries have attained that balance in their mixed economies but retained the same social programs that France has. And, they also have retained a green sensibility that promotes a clean environment. It can be done, but everything must be in moderation and not for the sake of mass consumption and rampant unregulated capitalism either. All things are better when in balance. Right now the U.S is out of balance and leaning more toward the fascist corporate state. It's catching up with us and it cannot be sustained either. We aren't France and there is no comparison between our system and theirs. If you actually went to France and Europe you would understand this and wouldn't be asking this question. Every country that has Universal healthcare runs it differently. The fact of the matter is that France has one of the best healthcare systems in the world. Ask any American who has lived over there.
2007-09-25 10:11:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
All of the major industrialized countries, with the exception of the US, have universal health care. Are they all bankrupt? If so, the world is in trouble. We’re bankrupting ourselves spending billions of dollars a week on a war in Iraq. We should divert resources away from destroying things to try to care for the health of Americans.
Also, as the article points out, the guy who said France is bankrupt is apparently prone to ill-advised outbursts.
2007-09-25 10:21:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the different difficulty is that in case you upload the populations and GNP of each and every of the worldwide places mutually, they make some million/4 the inhabitants and GNP of the U.S. previous all that, all those worldwide places have solid marketplace economies. you apart from mght probably be responsive to that a place like Sweden has very low company taxes and a few have no taxes on captial positive aspects. And all those worldwide places have homogeneous populations. worldwide comparisons are no longer project-free. there are in basic terms some no longer project-free and quickly policies. worldwide places with freer economies are very almost continuously extra useful than those without. Globalization and prosperity are stongly suitable. And democracy is going with the two. I don’t dislike socialism. of course you're able to have some cost mechanism. I lived in Norway and enjoyed various its social democratic aspects. It only would not paintings in a extensive and distinctive equipment. And it would not adapt properly to alter. Even in Scandinavia, it breaks down because of the fact the inhabitants gets extra distinctive. between the commerce offs in socialism is integration of variety. that is an excellent project for Europeans and why they have such project with immigrants. Ours are no longer something by utilising assessment. I permit my especially intelligent chum answer this>>>>>
2016-10-19 23:18:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
France is too liberal for the US? Has anyone held a union job? A government job? Talk about benefits that the taxpayer gets to pay for.
2007-09-25 10:33:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
is that the best you have ? lol...
You know France isn't the only country with universal healthcare....and many of the countries that do ...have stonger economies than our own... Just compare the value of apples to apples...or in this case dollars to US dollars.
Even CANADA has a stonger dollar than the US for the first time in FIFTY YEARS !....and guess what ?!..they also have universal healthcare.
Also, liberalism isn't synonymous with socialism....no matter how much you would like it to be so you can argue your misinformed assumptions.
2007-09-25 10:07:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Record bankruptcies and home foreclosures and gas prices under President Bush.
$38,000,000,000.00 in corporate welfare in the USA to bail out mortgage companies already this year, to start...
Welcome to bankrutpcy.
2007-09-25 10:18:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Darth Vader 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
dude.. France gives liberals a bad name... they are too liberal for even the "liberals" here in the US... 36 hour work weeks... too many Holidays... not to mention the fact that they are ... well... French...
We aren't France and Health Care is something we can afford... or do you think the Trillions we have blown in Iraq wouldn't cover it?
2007-09-25 10:09:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by pip 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually, that would be a problem with socialism -- which is where the govt takes all the money and controls businesses.
Liberalism promotes a laissez-faire economic model -- free market economy, which is basically capitalism.
2007-09-25 10:06:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
How could it be our future under Universal healthcare if Universal healthcare is proposed to cost a considerable amount less than our current war regime.
2007-09-25 10:05:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋