maybe if perpetrators of crime thought they were more likely to get caught perhaps they wouldnt commit crime in the first place
what do you think
xxx vici
2007-09-25 09:59:13 · 5 answers · asked by vici 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Possibly,
However, I would be unwilling to forfeit that right of privacy to see.
2007-09-25 10:28:28 · answer #1 · answered by smedrik 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really. Criminals are not all that rational. DNA databases do exist but the fear of apprehension is not sufficient to deter.
Privacy these data would be difficult to control especially from the government. Medical privacy would go out the window if you were required to provide your DNA to the government.
2007-09-25 17:09:23 · answer #2 · answered by KarenL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DNA evidence does not play into a large amount of crimes, therefore, it would not have a substantial impact.
Also, forcing persons to submit their DNA would be an unreasonable intrusion, and is against the Fourth Amendment.
2007-09-25 17:02:58 · answer #3 · answered by trooper3316 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. Crimes are committed every day with video proof of the perpetrator... cops still need to track them down.
DNA might be of some value in PROVING guilt.
2007-09-25 18:39:50 · answer #4 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a DNA data base.
2007-09-25 17:05:22 · answer #5 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋