2007-09-25 09:40:15 · 10 answers · asked by ken s 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Killed it. Public education will be gone soon. To bad, it was a great idea for a while. Now it is a very expensive way to deprive children of a proper education.
2007-09-25 15:24:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Their conflict cry, "for the babies" is bogus, because of the fact the "Legacy" expenses for pension & clinical shield retirees exceeds the cost for energetic accountability instructors. Bond themes are to conceal new retirements, the babies consistently get much less. As with different public service unions, the government (officers, workers, classes), GM, Social secure practices, Medicare/Medicaid, the pyramid is inverted & in basic terms getting extra lopsided. one hundred years of receiving much less and paying extra. once you upload a "center-guy", what do you assume to ensue to high quality. Ever ask your self why prepared crime is so firmly entrenched in Unions? 25% savior, and seventy 5% Racket. (transport & dealing with fees) Too undesirable they do no longer instruct math to themselves. Even a pie-chart will do. Love the way Union officers make extra funds than the Governor does in Wisconsin. I had the numbers as quickly as, 3 make way extra suitable than he does, and 5 others are interior of penny's of what he makes. Public servants my around pink backside! Self Servants (now uncovered)
2016-10-19 23:14:51 · answer #2 · answered by hussaini 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats it- blame teachers and the professional organization that covers their @sses.
its not parent's fault, when they have kids they cant pay for, let them run in the streets like wild dogs, and expect society, i.e. teachers, public assistance, and cops and courts, to pick up the slack
its not bush's fault, when he enacts legislation that effectively kills schools in neighborhoods that need them most
its not our fault, when we elect leaders who promise to save us a few tax dollars and we dont ask where it comes from.
how dare teachers have a union. damn teachers.
we should fire all the teachers; then we could all quit our jobs and take care of our own friggin children... since we are all geniuses, I am sure we could do a better job than some "teacher" could..
2007-09-25 09:59:40 · answer #3 · answered by dr schmitty 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
before the Unions teachers were treated like crap.
fewer and fewer people were willing to be a teacher.
if someone didn't step in to help them the schools would be in worse shape than they are now.
as Always its the School Board that is to blame for All the problems in the schools
2007-09-25 09:48:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nothing positive. As the cost of education goes up, the quality has been going down. Isn't that ironic?
2007-09-25 09:43:49 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
NOTHING, but vote the Democrat line, like there told to by the union bosses.
2007-09-25 15:28:35 · answer #6 · answered by jerry z 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kept teachers in the classrooms for one -- and ensured that the standards for teachers are not whimsical -- which goes a long way towards ensuring the quality of teachers.
2007-09-25 09:45:05 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It has ensured that teachers stay at a decent quality and get paid a decent salary (though obviously that decent salary is still much too low).
2007-09-25 09:47:50 · answer #8 · answered by Pieter K 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Not one thing. They are a Liberal Front for propagating their leftist agenda
2007-09-25 09:48:02 · answer #9 · answered by Tommy 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
they dummed it down
2007-09-25 09:52:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋