One you can get the cash and tell him to sleep in the other room and the other one ......... yeah.... I see your point.
2007-09-25 09:07:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ronatnyu 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No difference.
When it comes down to it, marriage is a legal contract, just like any other.
If you are a citizen of the US, you were born exceptionally lucky. If you have a chance to give a similar chance for a better life to somebody else, you should not hesitate.
It's a matter of recognizing your unfair privilege.
Naturally, best would be to combine that with romance. But it doesn't happen every time.
2007-09-25 16:09:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lenka 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
the diff is that the guy who loves me nicely gets to hang out with me sometimes.
the sponge who just wanted his citizenship papers; and any woman with cash would do,he had to go home.
aawww,poor diddums to the dang fool.:P
2007-09-25 20:20:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by t_blond_chick 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The difference is that in the first instance you are allowing yourself to be exploited - like a form of prostitution (in the wider sense of the word) - for the benefit of only one of you.
2007-09-25 18:38:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dolores & the prune 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The difference is how much cash he drops in your checking account before the nuptials.
2007-09-25 16:03:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Madam Naka 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
big difference....the citizenship one probably will pay you only once...the one for love may pay to support you for a lifetime if you let him.
2007-09-25 16:03:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by sophieb 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
None at all now sign the papers
2007-09-25 16:07:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Um, there's a huge difference.
2007-09-25 16:01:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sarah 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd do the citizenship thing if there was $$ involved :)
2007-09-25 16:01:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by B 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Are you gittin hitched up with Buk?!
2007-09-25 16:05:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋