Maybe we could just talk about our problems?
2007-09-25 07:56:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
This man talks with forked tongue. There is nothing this man says or does that is productive or honest. This man is running around the world telling any fool who will listen that the holocaust never happened and that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job.
Do you see a way to reach middle ground with someone like this ? Do you believe Iran's intentions in developing nuclear power are for peaceful means only.
Ahmadinejad is looking for a fight, and it's not far off. The world will not sit by while this he keeps provoking a fight. This man has crossed the line of reasonable argument.
2007-09-25 08:27:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
If you saw what happened at Columbia, it would be clear to you. Iran's president ignored all the questions posed to him by Columbia's president and side stepped a few student questions while ignoring most of the rest. He wasn't interested in listening or understanding our side. All he wanted was a platform to present his radical (They go against what is taught in the Koran.) ideas.
Don't be fooled. At least 75% of the insurgent suicide bombers killing American soldiers and Iraqi citizens crossed the border from Iran into Iraq. Iran is trying to put up another radical government like theirs and they aren't interested in even letting people vote about it. It is "You do it Iran's way or you die". Iran is the major arms supplier for all the radicals across the area and they have made it known in no uncertain terms that they will destroy any country or people who oppose them. There is only one way to deal with them -- nuke them until they glow in the dark and then finish them off with a night attack.
2007-09-25 08:12:05 · answer #2 · answered by Captain Cupcake 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, because there's no reason to believe he'll tell the truth. Believing anything he says is dangerous, he's liable to lead you into a false sense of security and then do the opposite of what he says. He's somewhat of a figurehead too, he doesn't hold the real power in Iran.
2007-09-25 08:06:13 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's an essential element, but not the whole process. Unless we really want another war, we need to engage Iran while keeping up the pressure to reform. If we can give him a way to improve his status within Iran while cutting back on provocations toward the rest of the world, we could all walk away better off.
2007-09-25 08:05:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You cannot engage with such despicable people without raising their image. If you talk to a slug you raise the slug to the status of being worth talking to. The man represents one of the main sources of evil in the world. He has been aiding, abetting and insuring the killing of many Iraqi civilians and American soldiers. I would consider him a dung beetle except a dung beetle is much more valuable.
.
2007-09-25 08:12:34 · answer #5 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the Columbia president made a clear distinction between allowing someone to present their views and putting their views up to debate, and the debate that Ahmadinejad was subjected to was well-organized and showed the bitter truth about Ahmadinejad's Holocaust skepticism
The problem is that Ahmadinejad speaks idealistically, but (perhaps because he is not the supreme leader of Iran) the Iranian government does not operate in a just and equal way. However, it is important to remember that Iran has a better record than US allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait
2007-09-25 08:00:58 · answer #6 · answered by MrPotatoHead 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
that heavily isn't adequate. you will possibly could throw in adequate enriched uranium so as that they are able to blow their enemies off the planet. Oh wait. we are a million of their enemies. Do you think of Clinton could carry all of that on her broom?
2016-10-19 23:01:19 · answer #7 · answered by joleen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those who don't study it are bound to repeat it. Talking about it with Iran would be as fruitful as Neville Chamberlain's talking about it with Adolf Hitler. So much for the "Peace in our time" speech...
2007-09-25 08:00:44 · answer #8 · answered by Doc 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Having and maintaining open dialog is always the best way to discover and learn what our differences and our similarities are. In maintaining that dialog, the answers are within our reach.
2007-09-25 08:01:28 · answer #9 · answered by Chris B 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
He dont care what we nor anyone else think about what he thinks.
Most of his own people think he's nuts.
2007-09-25 08:44:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋