English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-25 07:30:54 · 26 answers · asked by kimmyisahotbabe 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Jacob W, thank you for seeing the point of my post. I guess it's a little too subtle for most of the people here.

2007-09-25 07:58:54 · update #1

26 answers

You bring up an very interesting point. True, the liberals believe that Saddam had no WMD. True, the American intell states that he used those weapons on the Kurds, which are indeed some of his own people. The Iranian President is verifying what Bush said. Putting the lie to the liberal WMD nay sayers.

Well done.

.

2007-09-25 07:38:17 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 3 1

Whoever said Saddam did not use WMD's against his own people? It's a well documented fact that Saddam used chemical weapons to kill thousands of Kurds. He also used them against Iran during the Iran/Iraq war.
Your question, by the way, is also leading. Your assuming that everyone thinks that Bush is a liar. The popular view isn't always the right one. But since we're talking about Saddam, not Bush... see sources. There are many more.

2007-09-25 07:42:40 · answer #2 · answered by URCHEN 1 · 4 0

actually no...that part is true... although Saddam didn't consider the Kurd's to be "his people"....and Saddam used chemical weapons against Iran as well....so there you have it.

btw. that was pre-Iraq war part I... before Bush Sr. invaded the first time. Then all the WMD's were declared under an arranged agreement with the UN, and subsequently destroyed. What your refferring to is comments made about two seperate incidents...which are also decades apart.

The only WMD's Saddam ever had...are the ones Donald Rumsfeld sold him in the late 80's and they were all accounted for. The LIE from Bush was where he said the CIA had information that Saddam tried to purchase Uranium from Africa....he said this in his presidential address. Susequently this was found out to be fabricated intelligence, and the Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame scandal is the result of trying to keep the lie believable..

You can verify the WMD info yourself through declassified CIA transcripts on their website.

2007-09-25 07:42:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hello again kimmy...... yes it's true what Ah-d said. We have the graves of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Iranian Kurds that systematically
underwent genocide long before Ah-d was even an adult.
In the 70's I worked with an Iraqi here in LA who had been in
the Iraqi Army.
But it's no secret that during the Iran-Iraq war untold thousand of Iranian children went into battle at the order of Ayatollah Komeini against the Iraqi Army and were slaughtered like cattle by Saddams armies.
I figure Ah-d has a short time to repent of the evil perpetrated by the Iranian government. Otherwise there's a cell in hell
that has his name on it.
I Cr 13;8a

2007-09-25 09:55:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

It grow to be a joint attempt. in the 80's, Saddam grow to be the third perfect client for the British palms marketplace (the 2nd best in the worldwide at the back of the u . s .), and additionally between the u . s .'s perfect. He grow to be bought sarin & tabun gasoline by utilising the British government, which grow to be developed on the British chemical & bioweapons facility at Porton Down in Wiltshire. The Thatcher government approved the export licenses. The missile tech & gadget equipment Saddam had to grant the gasoline grow to be synthetic & shipped by utilising ATCC, a chemical weapons producer and US defence contractor in Maryland. The export licence grow to be granted by utilising the Reagan administration. I actual have been advised that ATCC additionally shipped chemical weapons to Saddam as properly, yet have in no way been waiting to ascertain this, so it would be warm air. something of what I actual have written above is on record on the Library of Congress.

2016-10-19 22:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by joleen 4 · 0 0

Saddam did use chemical weapons on his own people. Ahmadinejad is a liar but not because he said that...he's a liar because he claims there are no homosexuals in Iran.

2007-09-25 07:34:26 · answer #6 · answered by M & M 3 · 3 0

No one other than Saddam and his lackys have ever denied that he used chemical weapons on his own people. Bush is a liar and Ahmadinejad probably is too, not because of the comment on chemical usage but for a bunch of other things.

2007-09-25 07:46:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Nobody denies what Saddam did was wrong. Nobody even denies he had WMD's. The issue is that we dropped the Osama issue and any concern over our attackers to go after Iraq. And we're STILL in there, despite the fact that we're not wanted there by the general public.

2007-09-25 07:44:19 · answer #8 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1 1

Noone disputes that saddam used WMD's on his own people.

They do however dispute whether or not he had done away with them.

At any rate, none have ever been found, which means that Bush, along with every other person in this administration, in the media, and in neo-conservative think tanks were 100% wrong.

Oh, and the 'he snuck them out of the country' theory neglects to remember that noone sneaks weapons out of their country when they think an attack is imminent.

2007-09-25 07:35:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Everyone who agrees with Bush is automatically a liar according to Democrats. Remember to always trust both Clintons because they never lie...lol

2007-09-25 11:05:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers