I mean, if the didn't raise a fuss about some things, would we care as much? Would civilization be better around the world if it was all kept unbroadcasted?
2007-09-25 07:29:37 · 8 answers · asked by Jen2U 3 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
For the most part, the mass media today has fallen out of the practice of reporting news. Many major outlets have had people reach influential positions who have a very large political and social axe to grind. The media have come to see themselves as news makers whose responsibility is to guide events rather than report them. As long as this philosophy exists, they are responsible for a great deal of today's turmoil.
2007-09-25 15:03:53 · answer #1 · answered by Al S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only what get mentioned on the media is basically what we know. You need to read the book "1984" by Geoge Orwell.
Also in 1980 the media announced Ronald Reagan was elected by a landslide. The down side was the pools were open in CA and some voters stayed home and lower level Democratic candidates didn't get votes they counted on.
2007-09-25 07:33:58 · answer #2 · answered by Will 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
do not blame President Fox for the severe poverty in Mexico. there is in basic terms plenty wealth interior of a given united states of america, & Mexicans administration decrease than 0.5 of theirs. something is controlled via an identical companies, regularly interior the US, who earnings from the super, much less costly hard paintings pool of unlawful immigrants. Fox can in basic terms do plenty earlier stepping on the earnings of those agencies. Any considered necessary or South American chief who has tried has been demonized as Communist. Chavez in Venezuela & Ortega in Nicaragua are sturdy examples of this. the two have been elected via their human beings in honest elections. Ortega served a term, grow to be elected to circulate abode, & at present re elected for yet another term. that's not the Communism I discovered in school. you're very dazzling for not blaming the sufferers interior the unlawful immigration debate. each and every time residing standards between 2 international locations variety a great deal, the adverse will to migrate to the richer united states of america. as long because of the fact the companies make the main of their hard paintings, they're going to proceed to hire them.
2016-12-28 03:02:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theres nothing wrong in reporting facts,the problem comes from the media's interpetations or slant on things that I feel are damaging to society,as well as to those who have a public image to protect..
2007-09-25 07:52:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hate the news media but guess what, the only alternative is signing up for the congressional newsletter (yawn) or the defense department news letters (also yawn).
2007-09-25 07:33:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Only if liberal views of sex and gender roles are a societal problem, because that's what all the most popular tv shows portray.."Sex in the City," "Friends",, blah blah blah.
2007-09-25 19:53:16 · answer #6 · answered by boboo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Defintitely, my dear.
2007-09-25 07:40:05 · answer #7 · answered by FILO 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You think?
2007-09-25 07:47:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋