As A-Jad would say YOU INFIDELS,,,,& ISRAEL MUST DIE,,,,so what do you think,,,safe or ?
2007-09-25
07:11:15
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I feel like a proud Infidel today,,as I know Iran is toast,,,,,,thanks Bush,,,,,
2007-09-25
07:18:17 ·
update #1
none of you understand the question,,im not talking about bomb on United states,,im talking about feeling safe at home,,see if the rest of the WORLD goes up in smoke,,,your not safe at home,in America ,,Iran wants to get nuclear bombs,,,they will not ,,,,,cause isreal or U,S,A will stop them cold,,,,
2007-09-25
10:28:49 ·
update #2
If anyone feels safe with Iran, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela with nuclear power they are fools.
2007-09-25 07:16:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
i think of it is possibly that their nuclear centers are twin objective, for the two capability and weapons. of direction they could be a danger to Israel by using fact they have the bomb. Will Iran use the bomb? i've got not got faith they are going to use it offensively, yet they could truthfully use it to safeguard themselves from American, British, or Israeli assault. the main important undertaking isn't no remember if or not the Iranians will use it, by using fact they probable won't (everybody which includes the Iranian is accustomed to what the outcomes could be finished retaliation and jointly assured destruction). the phobia is that if greater countries have nuclear weapons, it is greater possibly for people who could use them, like Al Queda, to arise with them by using corrupt government officers or theft. greater nuclear weapons skill a greater danger that one would be used.
2016-12-17 10:04:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by borucki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously you don't understand. Israel also has nukes and is not afraid to use them. The threat of mutual destruction should be enough to keep either of them from attacking the other. Talk is cheap. He is pandering to the clerics that actually want to run Iran their way.
While Iran could have the means of delivering a nuke to Israel (several years yet) they do not and won't have any means of delivering such a device on the US. Right wing scare tactics would have us cowering in a corner if it weren't for people beginning to wake up to their tactics.
2007-09-25 07:17:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Actually, he didn't say that -- and according to general Islamic doctrine, neither Jews nor Christians are infidels -- since both of those religions also worship the same God of Abraham.
The only fanatic groups that consider those religions to be infidels also include any other opposing Muslims sect as well -- which makes it less about one religion versus another, and more about the fanatic groups against everyone else.
That being said -- many countries have nuclear weapons -- as long as they don't get used, I don't see the harm -- and the US, India and Pakistan are all much more likely to use such weapons than any of the other countries that have them.
Then again, you don't see us invading Pakistan -- or even North Korea -- just because they have nuclear capability.
2007-09-25 07:19:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
About as safe as I felt September 10th 2001.
If we let rhetoric, & fear run our lives, than we really have lost. True, Iran may be a threat, but worrying about whether or not they get a bomb will change very little.
2007-09-25 07:19:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Diamond24 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think the blue staters are under the belief that A-Jad would only nuke the red staters. Oh, wait, they "feel" that to be true.
But they don't realize it's hard to be accurate in shooting a nuclear warhead out of a camel's assss. So unfortunately we are all a target to that madman
2007-09-25 07:19:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wayne G 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
I'm more worried about the nukes in Pakistan. Also, keeping them away from the Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia would be good.
I don't want radical Muslims to have them.
.
2007-09-25 07:19:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Lots would feel safe because that would give every super power the right to lay waste to Iran.
2007-09-25 07:16:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I think people should get real. I thought it was completely embarassing how the man was introduced by the president of Columbia University. When are people going to relize that we in the USA get such a watered down version of the truth it is no wonder more people do not hate us. Iran deserves to have all the same technologies that anone else in the world does......it creates more of an equal playing field just incase the Bush family desides to stay in the game longer on the inside. No one wants nuclear fall out....... how much longer are we going to live in fear over what our govt tells us.
Watch Free Speech Tv and another chanel besides CNN and Fox.
NEW YORK (AP) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is addressing the U.N. General Assembly Tuesday after defending Holocaust revisionists and raising questions about who carried out the Sept. 11 attacks in a tense showdown at Columbia University.
Thousands of people protested Ahmadinejad's visit Monday and more were expected to rally in the streets Tuesday when the Iranian leader attends the meeting for the third time in three years.
In his speech Tuesday afternoon, Ahmadinejad is expected to take the same conciliatory approach he did in an interview with The Associated Press and in other appearances on Monday. He presented his country as a reasonable seeker of peace and justice and denied that it holds any violent intentions against the United States, Israel or any of its immediate neighbors.
He also denied all the chief accusations against Iran: that it is providing weapons to kill U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, supporting terrorism or breaking international law by developing nuclear weapons.
Asked about his country's nuclear intentions during the appearance at Columbia on Monday, Ahmadinejad insisted the program is peaceful, legal and entirely within Iran's rights, despite attempts by "monopolistic," "selfish" powers to derail it. "How come is it that you have that right, and we can't have it?" he added.
Ahmadinejad portrayed himself as an intellectual and argued that his administration respected reason and science. But the former engineering professor, appearing shaken and irate over he called "insults" from his host, soon found himself drawn into the type of rhetoric that has alienated American audiences in the past.
Columbia's president, Lee Bollinger, set the combative tone in his introduction of Ahmadinejad: "Mr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictator."
Iranian state-run TV channels on Tuesday showed news reports of the Columbia event and called the introduction "impolite." The English version of the IRNA news agency said that despite "entire U.S. media objections, negative propagation" Ahmadinejad still had his lecture and answered questions.
Ahmadinejad drew audience applause at times, such as when he bemoaned the plight of the Palestinians. But he often declined to offer the simple answers the audience sought, responding instead with his own questions or long statements about history and justice.
Ahmadinejad has in the past called for Israel's elimination. But his exact remarks have been disputed. Some translators say he called for Israel to be "wiped off the map," but others say that would be better translated as "vanish from the pages of time" _ implying Israel would disappear on its own rather than be destroyed.
Asked by an audience member if Iran sought the destruction of Israel, Ahmadinejad did not answer directly.
"We are friends of all the nations," he said. "We are friends with the Jewish people. There are many Jews in Iran living peacefully with security."
Ahmadinejad's past statements about the Holocaust also have raised hackles in the West, and were soundly attacked by Bollinger.
"In a December 2005 state television broadcast, you described the Holocaust as the fabricated legend," Bollinger told Ahmadinejad said in his opening remarks. "One year later, you held a two-day conference of Holocaust deniers."
Bollinger said that might fool the illiterate and ignorant.
"When you come to a place like this, it makes you simply ridiculous. The truth is that the Holocaust is the most documented event in human history," he said.
Ahmadinejad said he wasn't passing judgment on whether the Holocaust occurred, but that, "assuming this happened, what does it have to do with the Palestinian people?"
He went on to say that he was defending the rights of European academics imprisoned for "questioning certain aspects" of the Holocaust, an apparent reference to a small number who have been prosecuted under national laws for denying or minimizing the genocide.
"There's nothing known as absolute," Ahmadinejad said. He said the Holocaust has been abused as a justification for Israeli mistreatment of the Palestinians.
"Why is it that the Palestinian people are paying the price for an event they had nothing to do with?" he asked.
Asked why he had asked to visit the World Trade Center site _ a request denied by New York authorities _ Ahmadinejad said he wanted to express sympathy for the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Then he appeared to question whether al-Qaida was responsible, saying more research was needed.
"If the root causes of 9/11 are examined properly _ why it happened, what caused it, what were the conditions that led to it, who truly was involved, who was really involved _ and put it all together to understand how to prevent the crisis in Iraq, fix the problem in Afghanistan and Iraq combined," Ahmadinejad said.
President Bush said Ahmadinejad's appearance at Columbia "speaks volumes about, really, the greatness of America."
He told Fox News Channel that if Bollinger considered Ahmadinejad's visit an educational experience for Columbia students, "I guess it's OK with me."
But conservatives on Capitol Hill were critical. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, said he thought the invitation to Ahmadinejad was a mistake "because he comes literally with blood on his hands."
2007-09-25 07:23:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stephanie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
very safe your first bomb set off in the USA would be the extinction of your counrty... 1 submarine ...is enough to turn your counrty into a glass parking lot!
2007-09-25 07:22:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Robert P 6
·
1⤊
2⤋