Did you see his speech? Doesn't it seem like one could basically summarize his views, as follows?: 9/11, the American invasion of Iraq, the problems faced by the muslim world, basically all of the world's woes, are the fault of Israel and/or the Jews. I guess with his "blame the Jews" strategy, the man has allied himself with Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, and various other anti-semitic groups. And this is a man who's a self-professed "academic."
2007-09-25
06:04:00
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Stephen L
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
To vondee33: I'm not sure I would call those people "anti-semites" but I know what you're saying. Apparently some evangelicals believe that all Jews must return to Israel (willingly I hope) before the second coming can occur.
I think there's a great deal of truth in what you stated in your second paragraph. We need someone to hate, and the press needs someone "evil" to report about.
2007-09-25
06:20:20 ·
update #1
Vondee: I looked at some of your other answers out of interest. Since you don't accept e-mail, I thought I would comment here on your answer about the best president, which is a great answer, because you might very well be the only one in the world who says it's Andrew Johnson (perhaps tongue in cheek?). But that was a heck of a deal for Alaska, although I would have to place more value on Washington's resistance to power. In any event, don't you think there are "just wars?" For instance, I always thought that the U.S. was at fault for not entering WWII at least a year sooner. More contemporarily, when Iraq invaded Kuwait, I thought it was appropriate for us to get involved. Even in an internal struggle, I think one can justify war to prevent mass murder. I wasn't opposed to temporarily invading Iraq for the limited purpose of WMD verification, it's our futile attempt at "nation building," that I think is the disaster.
2007-09-25
08:06:52 ·
update #2