I'm sorrry, I couldn't help but think this was a joke, because one hit my maleness immediately, and one left me cold . . .
As you probably know, I very much love curvy women . . . which is not to say they are fat women!
I would love my wife to be size 12. Conventional supermodels rarely make me hot and bothered, but the top model made me stop dead in my tracks, especially that second photo of her. Perhaps she could stand to hit the exercise bike (strong, muscular yet still sleek female legs are a huge turn-on for me), but sheesh who am I to complain?
The other model is pathetically thin and needs medical help before she dies at an early age of malnutrition. She does not arouse me in the SLIGHTEST. She looks like David Bowie when he was doing the Ziggy Stardust thing. That bathing suit does not help her AT ALL.
Anyway, the size 12 model, by a ludicrous landslide!
2007-09-25 23:02:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The model I prefer? Easy choice: Jen Hunter, she has curves where there should be curves, cleavage instead of bumplets (new word I just made up), and would gladly snuggle up to her anytime day or night, over having a skeleton share my bed.
I really can't understand why size 0 models are desired at all, unless it is the designer's choice because they use less fabric! Can you figure this out? Why would anyone prefer a skeleton wrapped with skin-colored cellophane? Give me someone like Marilyn Monroe any day (or night) ... please!
2007-09-26 10:00:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andy K 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The healthy model (Jen Hunter) is easy on the eyes, she's darling. The emaciated model (Marianne Berglund) looks seriously ill and would not look out of place as an extra in a concentration camp movie. Where is her mother?
2007-09-25 13:01:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
First one the top one only because I dont like to see ribs popping out on the other one... LOL the second pic the bottom one cause the first one looks like a crack head
2007-09-25 12:48:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The top one. Because she is soft and curvy and looks like a woman. The bottom one looks like a very sick little boy. I mean honestly, it looks like his “Make a Wish” wish was to have a one piece gold bathing suit. Call me crazy, but I like for my women to be distinguishable as women. I mean if your natural shape is really slim, that’s one thing, but you cannot tell me that is the skinny model’s natural shape.
2007-09-25 13:12:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Closed for business 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The thicker one is GORGEOUS! I feel like if I looked at the skinny one for too long, she'd break in half.....let alone actually doing anything with her. Someone get her a sandwich or something.
2007-09-25 12:56:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The one with the long hair, she has got the expression in her face while the other one lacks facial expression.
And on top of that the long haired one looks just like Erica.
2007-09-25 12:50:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alexecution: Kickilution 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The top model in the first view and the bottom model in the second view.
I'm not keen on skeletons
2007-09-25 15:26:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by nickson faction 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
OMG!!!!! The second one looks horrible!!! Why do women think they have to be that thin to look good. When you loose weight like that does the eyesight go too?
2007-09-25 13:40:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by MomToDavid 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Holy $hit! That anorexic one looks like she's about to drop dead. Honestly - she looks UGLY! Jen Hunter looks healthy and beautiful. Not to mention human...
2007-09-25 12:49:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋