Why does the far left think that we should be nice to terrorists,?

Question

Don't they know that when the radical islamics take over they will be the first to have their heads chopped off?

Answer 1

They don't have a clue.

These are the same people as kids that would make friends with the bullies to be safe, and are now older but not wiser.

Answer 2

I have a "Common Sense" approach to politics. If it doesn't make sense, then I don't care WHO said it.

See, Terrorism is not just an evil act. Being a terrorist is just a by-product of a lifestyle. These people were trained since birth that their religion is FAR more important than their life. So when I say they were born to kill, it's because they truly believe it is the right thing to do. They have no recourse because they have been shown no options.

Our job (I believe) is not to eliminate terrorism. You will never be successful at that with violence. Our goal is to provide an option. This option is called freedom. Our brave souls that fight to bring these countries freedom are doing so to give these people who have never 'tasted' freedom a close look at it. If freedom is actually better to them than violence, then maybe we will succeed.

To say we are winning a war against terrorism is IMO an outrage.

So No, they are not kind to terrorists, but they may understand the big picture just a bit better.

For the record, I am a registered republican. But I also think for myself.

Answer 3

They think that if we are nice to them they'll see that we are nice people and don't want to be their enemies, and then they will leave us alone. Then we'll all have a nice picnic on the Good-ship Lollipop and sing Cumbayah around the campfire while smoking weed and braiding each other's hair.

If only that little thing called radical fanatical religious Islam weren't getting in the way.

Answer 4

Most of the far left don't think we should be nice to terrorists, they think the same way we do. They just do these crazy silly things like let a terror monger speak at Colombia University because they hate Pres. Bush sooo much they want to prove him wrong soooooo bad that they will go to any lengths to do so. It is the silliest, most child like game ever. The sane amongst us must push forward (even though we are not vocal) and do the right things here.

Answer 5

You see you brought me into confusion.. get to the real meaning of who is a terrorist?? How is it possible that we continue to live on the land earth with just one brand as terrorists?
Why are they not other terrorists in this world? I want you all reading this part to think over it with straight-out on vision of who has been the leader in chopping off heads of human life and humanity?

IF YOU ARE REALLY WORRIED FOR SAVING THE HUMAN LIVES ON PLANET EARTH

Answer 6

The Far Left is composed of the real outcasts and dregs of society, people who didn't pay attention in school. They have had over 40 years to learn Ronald Reagan's wise words of caution:

"Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state have told us that they have a utopian solution of peace without victory. They call this policy "accommodation." And they say if we only avoid any direct confrontation with the enemy, he will forget his evil ways and learn to love us."

Liberals actually believe we can peacefully negotiate some happy, sunny day compromise with the terrorists. Obviously, they have never paid attention to what happens every time Israel has tried that tactic. On ever occasion, the terrorists only get emboldened, believing that Israel must be weakening; otherwise, why would they give something up for free?

Mind of a terrorist. Implacable, and scary.

Mind of a Far Left Liberal: used to be kind of cute and endearing to watch in amusement how stridently they would have their silly little protest marches, dressed up in their best imitation 1960's flower power and psychedelic outfits, complete with dirty shoes. But now their idiocy is life threatening, and no longer cute.

Answer 7

We should be nice to everyone.
That may sound kind of crazy, but if we had that cemented in our heads from birth, the world would be a better place. Terrorists are taught from birth how to be a terrorist. Nobody has ever been nice to them. If we started NOW, maybe generations of people in the future would knock off the "My dogs bigger than your dog" attitude". Lead by example, be nice.

Answer 8

I don't think the far left thinks that. But I'll give you that one.
I want to point out that the government of the USA took over already and it's "cutting heads" of dissenters, including Nick Berg and Ken Bigley who were actually beheaded.
Add to them war objectors treated as criminals, regular people detained under unconstitutional "acts" with no right to defense, people denouncing mismanagement of resources in Iraq fired and economically ruined. It's a long list...

Answer 9

Part of the problem with being a liberal is that you are so open minded that you will not even take your own side in an argument. And, that is where the problem lies.

A lot of the time, the leftist think that if the initiate an open and honest dialog with their adversaries, the other party will respond in kind. As noble of a goal as it is, diplomacy only works when both parties are interested in talking. A lot of the far left do not realize that because if they were approached for open and honest dialog to resolve differences, they would choose to participate.

Answer 10

Osama bin Laden was the main culprit behind the 9/11 attacks, but for some reason, almost immediately after the attacks, Bush & Co. focused on invading Iraq, despite the fact that it was in no way involved in the attacks. Now not only is Iraq overrun with terrorists and plagued by civil war, but Osama bin Laden is STILL a free man. In fact, Bush said that bringing bin Laden to justice was "no longer a priority", so who's REALLY being nice to the terrorists here?

Answer 11

There's a whole war on language that has been going on over the past six years, and your question is an example of that. It appears to be a reasonable question on the surface, but only if you accept the discourse that has been spewed about and accept it as reasonable.
If you start with the statement: If you're not with us, you're with the terrorist (A completely divisive statement which includes car mechanics as pro-terrorist if you push it to its extreme), that means all opponents to the administration qualify as terrorists.
Fact: We invade and occupy Iraq. By definition, toppling a regime and installing a country's armed forces is occupation. Neo-cons don't like this language because it may bring their actions into question. Some people in Iraq don't like the occupation. They strike back at the occupiers. We label them terrorists. As long as we label all opponents terrorists, we can always claim to be fighting a war on terror. Of course, this label is entirely unjust. You don't send troops in a country and expect no opposition. You may call them the enemy, but to call them terrorists by the very fact that they oppose you is stretching the definition of the word very far, especially since we're the ones who landed in their country.

As far as radical Islam taking over the world, that's a very alarmist world-vision and one that hardly corresponds to any sober analysis of geopolitics.