English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To start with Iraq of course,Then Iran fighting a proxy war against the U.S.Then you have Afghanistan,Turkey,Africa,Syria,But the biggest foe of all is the Liberal Democrats who are fighting a proxy war against George Bush.Even some Republicans are fighting against G.W.Those like Chuck Hagal.Then the Media Cris Mathews,Dan Rather and Keith Obberman.Let us not forget Code Blue,Moveon and Every Democrat Presidentual Candidate.In other words with all these countries and all these Traitors from America George Bush is still kicking ***.Our Military loves him and Republicans for the most part understand the hard work he is doing.So to the liberals of the world keep piling on every thing you do and say will be recorded for future generations!

2007-09-25 04:34:16 · 10 answers · asked by john 2 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

There are currently 15 fronts actively being waged as we speak

2007-09-25 04:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

There are only two types of fronts. One is the traditional battlefield in Afghanistan and Iraq. The other is in the media. You missed the point if you think only liberals are waging war on the media front. Everybody is! I think this is the most important front. Al Qaeda / insurgents / terrorists kill people, that gets on the media, decreases support for war in the US and other countries. Liberals fall for this and use their dislike of Bush to encourage a retreat. Bush makes it seem like its black and white: we're good, they're bad, we're right. All of these sides get their one-sided messages out to further their cause, and you end up with this clusterf*** of misinformation and emotionally charged people that don't know what to believe.

2007-09-25 04:54:51 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0 0

No, the war on terror is not a typical war. It is not like the WWI or WWII fought on a Eastern front and a Western front. We have to fight terrorism on every conceivable front, including the home front. The terrorists are not part of a unified Army so we cannot fight them like we would fight a traditional war.

2007-09-25 04:43:32 · answer #3 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 1 0

It's all about Iraq, isn't it?

Yep, it's all about Iraq and...

India and the Sudan and Algeria and Afghanistan and New York and Pakistan and Israel and Russia and Chechnya and the Philippines and Indonesia and Nigeria and England and Thailand and Spain and Egypt and Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia and Ingushetia and Dagestan and Turkey and Kabardino-Balkaria and Morocco and Yemen and Lebanon and France and Uzbekistan and Gaza and Tunisia and Kosovo and Bosnia and Mauritania and Kenya and Eritrea and Syria and Somalia and California and Argentina and Kuwait and Virginia and Ethiopia and Iran and Jordan and United Arab Emirates and Louisiana and Texas and Tanzania and Germany and Australia and Pennsylvania and Belgium and Denmark and East Timor and Qatar and Maryland and Tajikistan and the Netherlands and Scotland and Chad and Canada and China and...

...and pretty much wherever Muslims believe their religion tells them to:

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah, ... nor follow
the religion of truth... until they pay the tax in acknowledg-ment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection."
Qur'an, Sura 9:29

2007-09-25 04:38:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

I understand your point; however, I do not understand your logic.

In the supporting evidence to your views, you list everyone who disagrees with Bush's policy as a "terrorist". Please remember that it is every Americans right and obligation to question the government. Add that your views are the same as those of the governments in Cuba and North Korea.

2007-09-25 04:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1 0

I thought that the war on terrorism had been abandoned for the war for oil and occupation of Iraq. Don't tell me that we are out of Iraq and back to fighting the war on terrorism?

Why wasn't this covered by the news outlets?

2007-09-25 04:39:47 · answer #6 · answered by buffytou 6 · 2 4

No, I believe terror should be battled on ALL fronts. I simply do not agree with the handling of the fight.

2007-09-25 04:38:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

After reading your tirade, I am convinced about who our terrorists are - people like you! You are really out there, aren't you? There are drugs prescribed for your condition.

2007-09-25 04:43:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

what happens when you run out of soldiers? you americans going to start pulling kids out of primary school and stick a gun in their hands. oh wait, you do that already don't you?

2007-09-25 04:43:06 · answer #9 · answered by wotzthepoint? 5 · 1 2

In your dreams of course! :)

2007-09-25 04:38:36 · answer #10 · answered by Harribo 1 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers