Who was more influential in the civil rights movement. MLK jr, or Abraham Lincoln?

Answer 1

Lincoln started the movement, but King got more accomplished and got more people involved.

Answer 2

Lincoln had nothing to do with civil rights. Lincoln issued the emancipation proclamation, freeing slaves. According to documents on file with the Library of Congress, in a memo to one of his aides, Lincoln stated that his reasons for doing so was to demoralize the southern people and help bring the war to a rapid conclusion. He insinuated that the fact that slaves were allowed was not a concern in his decision. MLK Jr., on the other hand worked hard and with the support of JFK, got the civil rights bill passed.

Answer 3

Martin Luther King Jr. for the simple reason that though Lincoln set things up for the movement, he was assassinated before he was able to do anything besides preventing the Union from falling apart. King was able to follow through on much of the movement, so yes, he was more influential.

The simplest test of this is to ask who people imagine when you say "civil rights movement." They'll imagine King (or something he was involved in), but nearly never Lincoln.

Answer 4

I think this is kinda of comparing apples to oranges here as they were both great leaders of their time. MLK, Jr was the influential in the 1950's but Lincoln gave it a big shove in the the 1860's

Answer 5

I think Abraham Lincoln because he actually ended slavery. But then, he was president and MLK, Jr. wasn't so that's not really fair

Answer 6

Rev. King I think but, where would he have been if we still had slavery.
Somehow I don't get the feeling that President Lincoln had only the freedom of slaves in mind -as a matter of fact I have often wondered if he would have addressed slavery at all if it weren't for the threat of our nation splitting up over it .

Answer 7

Both were very influential, but I have to give it to MLK for sure. Google it if you have to. I think alot of it has to do with your personal thoughts on it.

Answer 8

there is not any doubt that Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. became a forger of the line to civil rights. As you in addition to mght spoke of, civil rights became an argument back to the early placed up civil war era, and a good style of folk and legislations has had that's outcomes on the advancements in equallity that have been attained. so a strategies as who "did" greater, MLK or LBJ, i think that even LBJ could taught that honor on the solid reverend. LBJ enacted legislations, yet MLK started and sustained a civil rights flow to verify that the legislations became enforced on each and all of the states. the sorrowful area is that we've misplaced sight of MLK's dream. MLK had a dream of a colour blind society, the place a guy (or woman) became judged by ability of their deeds and accomplishments and not their race or ethnicity, yet we proceed to segregate ourselves voluntarily from the NAACP, LULAC, Itallian American association, Polish American association, l. a. RAZA and quite some greater, includiing Senator Obama's Trinity United Church of Christ it incredibly is "Unashamedly Black". real equality could dictate that each and each physique people attempt for equivalent attention and hazard, no longer segregate themselves and demand preferrential scientific care. whilst the congregations foremost black club ought to have fun the accomplishments and contributions of Black individuals, their web site seems to be focused on their African historical past and that they proclaim an allegience to Africa, without declaring any "American" impact of their subculture. considering the fact that our faith is in our God, i don't sense a church ought to have a countrywide allegience, definite, no longer even america. keep in mind our historic past in that this united states of america became based by ability of folk attempting to flee the influencde of the Church of britain and the liberty from faith certain interior the bill of Rights prevents there from ever being a Church of america.