You answered your own question. Victory will be when all sides can meet in a conciliatory manner and the US can get out of there.......
2007-09-25 04:30:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
That 1000 year old civil war will not end for another 1000 years. Victory is not an option. When both sides are wrong there can be no victory and America is foolish to continue getting caught in the middle.
2007-09-25 11:47:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ray T 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Victory will is determined by the accomplishment of the mission. The mission will be accomplished when the president says so, probably by the placement of a big sign during a politically inspired photo op. Then he will take the troops out.
2007-09-25 11:41:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by buffytou 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
President Bush wants Iraq to be able to defend herself. The democrats want the US to lose at any cost. A stable Iraq would make the world safer but would cost a lot of dems their jobs.
2007-09-25 12:30:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by slodana2003 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
'Victory' for the Bush Administration would be creating a suitable business environment in Iraq and Iran for globalist corporations.
If they cared about combating global terrorism, the battlefield would be Wahhabi-dominated Saudi Arabia.
.
2007-09-25 11:38:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bushes definition of victory keeps changing.
I don't believe he ever had a plan to leave Iraq.
This is a main part of the neocon agenda.
2007-09-25 11:44:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by R8derMike 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I believe the US victory in Iraq should be tied to the dismantlement of the Iranian nuclear program which is a major threat to the entire Middle East .
2007-09-25 11:32:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
There is no plan for victory. The goal has changed several times and is just a ploy to keep us there so he and Cheney and all their buddies can make as much money off it as possible. If they really wanted to do something good they would have continued to persue Bin Laden, but he is still around like a soar on their a**. He is just waiting for the nexta administration to fix his mistake.
2007-09-25 11:38:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by outsider_27 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
A return to the status quo before the US invasion, except that Islamists will run the government instead of secularists.
2007-09-25 11:35:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Whatever the current administration says is a victory.
And since most of the mouth-foaming, chest-thumping, sabre-rattling neocons will blindly accept that; most of the sane people in the US will have to put up with years of right-wing crowing despite the casualty list and the disaster left in their wake.
2007-09-25 11:35:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋