English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

No, in fact I love to see other people in their Bare Feet in public, because I am Barefoot in public 24/7, and I go everywhere in my Bare Feet. I have been completely Barefoot for over 26 years. I am a musician so I can do my own Barefoot thing.

2007-09-26 01:41:47 · answer #1 · answered by bobsfeetstink 2 · 0 0

No, I am always barefoot. It is NOT dangerous, gross or unhealthy; feet get very tough very quickly, our skin is made to keep pathogens out, and feet are fully washable. Nor is it likely to get parasites. See source for more info.

When it comes to whether you like the appearance of bare feet, well, in flipflops and similar sandals you also see almost the entire foot... while for the barefooter, there is a far greater difference between a flipflop and bare feet; it is a great pleasure to feel all the different surfaces underfoot.

And there are NO health laws requiring footwear even in stores and restaurants.

2007-09-25 15:48:47 · answer #2 · answered by Sheriam 7 · 1 0

No, i'm consistently barefoot. that is not risky, gross or undesirable; feet get very difficult very in the present day, our epidermis is made to maintain pathogens out, and feet are totally cleanable. neither is it probably to get parasites. See source for extra info. whilst it contains no rely in case you like the visual charm of bare feet, properly, in flipflops and comparable sandals you besides might see purely approximately the finished foot... whilst for the barefooter, there's a some distance extra suitable distinction between a flipflop and bare feet; it somewhat is an incredible excitement to sense all the quite a few surfaces underfoot. And there are actually not any wellbeing rules requiring shoes even in shops and eating places.

2016-11-06 08:14:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why would it? That would be like saying, someone not wearing gloves in the winter bothers you. The ONLY reason humans started wearing something on their feet, was for protection against the elements. It had nothing to do with modesty, or civility. If a person doesn't feel the need for shoes, more power to em. I cannot see one good reason for this offending anyone. If it does offend you, then you are a pretty arrogant person in my book. How can you have the audacity, to assume you have the right to decide if it is ok for someone else to wear shoes?

2007-09-25 04:41:38 · answer #4 · answered by Danny 6 · 2 1

it depends on where they are... for some reason i cant stand someone in the grocery store barefoot.... i do live on the beach on an island so i see people barefoot all the time here and there.... the grocery store does it for me.... also no shirts in there men tend to do a lot.... lol and there was this girl in there with a string bikini on... and when i say string i mean string...lol

2007-09-25 04:19:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It depends on the person. If it is some fat old person then probably yes.

2007-09-25 09:08:26 · answer #6 · answered by Kenneth 4 · 0 1

men...thanx 4 the points

2007-10-01 09:08:58 · answer #7 · answered by bigmha2000 3 · 0 0

when you submit a question you should only hit the submit button once

2007-09-25 11:23:47 · answer #8 · answered by Booster Gold 5 · 1 0

Yes, because we live in America and that is not American-like. At least wear flip-flops.

2007-09-25 04:23:54 · answer #9 · answered by The Truth 4 · 1 3

not really unless their feet are gross or stinky cause sometimes you don't have time to worry about shoes like when your late to pick your kid up or something.

2007-09-25 04:21:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers