2007-09-25 04:02:33 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We technically don't have a two party "system". There are several different parties out there. There are 2 major parties that pretty much control government and that is probably because, overall, they are the most moderate and have managed to get a stranglehold on power. ............
2007-09-25 04:07:33 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you aware that the corrupt political party system was introduced into society hundreds of years ago by a cabal of of financial psychopaths,as a divide and conquer mechanism to ensure that the unthinking bleating Orwellian 'proles',are constantly fighting over question of insignificance.Whilst the proles are indulging in divide and conquer activities,the political parties and the controlled media are preparing the masses for their bosses -a cabal of financial psychopaths - a New World Financail Order. Any system of government that is based on a minoriy controlling everyone else by enacting laws that interfer with the civil liberties,denying the supreme prerogative and sanctity of all citizens,is tyrannical,corrupt and despotic. The people of America,England,Canada,France,New Zealand,Australia and many other countries are being governed by corrupted political party systems of government.
2016-05-18 01:18:14 · answer #2 · answered by glennis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vote for people who are in OTHER parties!!! We need a Multi-National Party System.
It's very difficult to build because during primaries, both Dems and Reps can vote at the Independants primaries, but Independants can't vote in either Dem or Rep primaries. Which means the Dems and Reps can vote for a candidate ("I") of an Independant party so that it swings votes to each side and "I" will still lose.
2007-09-25 05:26:28 · answer #3 · answered by dealerschool2006 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When it comes to election time, I would like to see a cap put on the amount a candidate can spend on their campaign. Maybe that would do away with some of the special interest funding of candidates. It would also help to level the playing field so that each candidate would be equal in getting their voices heard.
2007-09-25 04:28:00 · answer #4 · answered by Chief Yellow Horse 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get rid of Political parties all together. Why does someone have to be part of a political party to get elected?
2007-09-25 04:09:05 · answer #5 · answered by TyranusXX 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would require a "none of the above" vote option for all offices in the state and federal government. So when both parties give us turkeys we can reject them.
2007-09-25 04:07:58 · answer #6 · answered by paul 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there would be no parties. names of parties are not necessarily representative of the issues any more.
a national poll would be taken so americans had an opporunity to express their issues.
what the candidates did with this information would be 'key' in who got my vote.
2007-09-25 04:19:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would eliminate the parties. That way, each candidate would have to stand on his own record, policies, and drum up campaign funding in order to get elected.
2007-09-25 04:07:08 · answer #8 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would encourage each side to quit smearing the other. We can have our differences without the Rep vs. Dem *****-slapping.
2007-09-25 04:07:02 · answer #9 · answered by thezaylady 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Break the two-party duopoly!
2007-09-25 04:05:52 · answer #10 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋