was india's batting or fielding good
2007-09-25 03:25:05 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
yes it is
2007-09-25 03:40:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. twenty 20 is a great victory. This time India did not start as a hot favourite. The below par performance in the last world cup still haunting the minds. It was left to the thought that it will be "also in the race" affair. But the slow but steady performance started giving hopes. But still it was not an easy task to tackle teams like England, South Africa and Australia. India had to take every match as to that of a final and they did it. And that made the difference. Wonderful batting performance from Gautham Gambir, Shewag, The blood thirsty sixes from Yuvaraj, his 50 for 12 and subsequently his 50 for 20, Sarmas useful timely contribution exhibited the real strength of the Indian Batting. Likewise, R.P. Sing, Srisanth, Harbajan, Irfan kept their consistency throughout the series, except a very few occasions where the bowlers had to taste hard treatment from the opponent batsmen which was but natural in a 20 over match. But still they kept their nerves and showed their class. To summarise, batting, bowling as well as fielding of a high standard to be in finals was there and the team's enhanced morale clinched the cup. Hats off to Indian Team. Really a great victory.
2007-09-25 11:42:27 · answer #2 · answered by Dhendan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was an unbeliable, fantastic and great victory for india because no one had given any chance for this Indian team even to reach semi final stage and people have been making statements that India will, be crushed by Australia, South Africa and Pakistan. By their winning the world cup, the Indian team proved every one wrong as they excelled in batting, bowling and fielding.
2007-09-25 11:21:25 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was truely a nailbitter of a game. India did fairly good in batting but if it wasnt for the bowlers contribution they definately wouldnt have won the match for sure.
2007-09-25 10:32:45 · answer #4 · answered by patricia s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hats off to dhoni and his co.yeah it was surely a great achievement because india won the world cup only after a gap of 24 years though it was a t20world cup..but these too matters..a pride ..a reason to smile...
both the departments played an equal role.....every one had a part in the match...
2007-09-25 17:34:21 · answer #5 · answered by austie_j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everthing about the twenty 20 world cup was good. Batting, fielding, bowling .......................almost everything you know. Maahi's captaincy was good, Gambhir's batting was good, Yuvis 6 sixers were good, Sreesanth's catch in the end of the final was good, R.P. singh's bowling was good.
2007-09-27 07:20:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
60% batting,40% bowling.
supported by good fielding.
2007-09-25 10:59:46 · answer #7 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
india's batting & fielding both are very good
2007-09-26 04:39:50 · answer #8 · answered by siri 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes,definatly. India played better criket,It is good start for young team. best of luck team india & chuk de india.
2007-09-25 10:34:32 · answer #9 · answered by bhuppu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets be honest. the fielding was not upto the mark. Yes we won. We were lucky. Thats all.
2007-09-27 02:08:23 · answer #10 · answered by satishfreeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there luck was good and they keep themselves kalm in that crunch situation thats the reason they were able to hold the world cup after 24 years.
2007-09-26 07:12:39 · answer #11 · answered by manish t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋