2007-09-25 03:21:40 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
only people voting for Bush r those religious nuts that thinks he talks to god and republican women with a moustache
2007-09-25 03:25:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Have you seen his approval ratings?!? Give me a break. Only President in polling history to SUSTAIN less than 40% approval from the public for more than 18 straight months.
I wish Bush could run again. He'd get beat even if the Dems nominated OJ Simpson; Let alone a serious candidate-!
2007-09-25 03:50:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
initially, understanding that he had a 0.33 term as an option, he could administer his 2d term otherwise, so the pollnumbers does no longer have been so undesirable. Secondly, if he became working the democrats could have one among their "a catalogue" applicants, no longer the two you cite. 0.33 and maximum telling, as lots a Bush has permit a good style people down, and for all his glaring and not so glaring flaws, he could nonetheless win. If he became no longer beat by ability of Al Gore, or by ability of John Kerry, what makes those modern applicants any greater advantageous? Face it, you are able to call president Bush regardless of names you pick in ingredient of actuality HE STIILL gained. meaning the Democrats are at fault for no longer coping with to beat the least universal president in historic past. Me, i does no longer vote in any respect given the shortcoming of judgements, because it may make no real distinction besides.
2016-10-09 19:48:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, how in the hell did he get elected the second term? But I don't know, America was stupid enough to put him in a second, I wouldn't be surprised to see him a third. Hillary has a lot going - and I'm old enough to vote now!
2007-09-25 03:27:55 · answer #4 · answered by The Assassin with a Resume 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I would hope so, 8 years was more than enough...I am not the biggest Hillary supporter but Barack is one of the greatest candidates we have had in decades.
O8AMA
2007-09-25 03:26:16 · answer #5 · answered by klover_dso 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Only if the gop fixed the election again, just as they did in 2000 and 2004.
.
2007-09-25 03:30:14 · answer #6 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Although Bush sucks as President, Barak and Hillary are worse. It would have to be the lesser of thee evils.
2007-09-25 03:25:08 · answer #7 · answered by bmill74 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No. People are friggin sick to death of this guy. It's time we start having competant, rational leaders in Washington. But, then, that's an oxymoron isn't it?
2007-09-25 03:30:36 · answer #8 · answered by S&NFervor4Ever 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would hope not!! I like Hillary I think Barak Obama is a friggen tool...
2007-09-25 03:24:56 · answer #9 · answered by Wendy 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Bush wouldn't win an election for dogcatcher. Anyone that would support him at this point is delusional.
2007-09-25 03:25:25 · answer #10 · answered by wooper 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋