English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They call him a holocaust denier, but Israel denys the existance of the entire Palestinian race, they say there are no Palestinians , and deny them thier basic human rights and thier right to return to thier homes. whats worse denying something that happened 50 years ago or denying something that has been going on for 50 years.

2007-09-25 03:12:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

How long do people have to live in a place until they are considered a race, are Americans a race? Palestinians lived in Palestine atleast 10 times longer than any Americans lived in America.

2007-09-25 03:22:52 · update #1

16 answers

A raciest Israel is behind all the universal war scenario , their history is full of conspiracies and resulting holocausts , these days we see their conspiracies in full gloom , USA gone fully a Jew slave , the Jew dominant media have made US and the West to believe in Muslim enmity,

But the growing number of "body bags" going to USA will force them think about the real criminals behind 911 and probably any further attacks on USA , till then Palestinians , Afghanistan , Iraq and all Muslim world will have to suffer,

we believe that "falsehood is bound to parish"

AhmadiNijad is a popular leader of his nation,
conspiracy makers will see more holocausts due to their conspiracies ,

Allah says "they are playing their schemes and Allah is playing his scheme,no doubt Allah is the biggest scheme maker"

PLEASE BE PATIENT AND WAIT & SEE.

2007-09-25 03:57:44 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1 2

If what you're saying is true (and it's not), then one can use any wrong as a justification for another wrong. You're not just saying that "two wrongs make a right," but that any number of wrongs make a right.

Ahmadinejad doesn't just deny the holocaust, but he's called for the compete destruction of Israel. He practices censorship and discrimination in his country, supplies money and weapons to terror groups, and is developing a nuclear weapons program and lying about it. He told the audience at Columbia University that he has no homosexuals in his country, when the fact is they're arrested and jailed for being so.

There are plenty of reasons to be mad at him, to answer your initial question. I'm surprised you don't see that.

As for the Palestinians, they are not a race. In fact, there wasn't any such thing as a "Palestinian" up until a few decades ago. That was a label applied to those Arabs living in Israel that were convinced by their Arab neighbors to abandon their homes and "push the Jews into the sea." When they lost, their Arab allies refused to help them, and thus created the refugee situation that exists today.

Can you name one other place on the planet where you have third and fourth generation refugees? The Arabs refuse to grant citizenship to the Palestinians, and instead encourage them to commit acts of terror against Israel rather than find a peaceful solution agreeable to both sides.

2007-09-25 10:27:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I think that the Palestinian people should have their own land. I wish that they could share land peacefully with Israel. I do question the right of the rest of the world to create a country where people were living without real negotiations. But then again look what people did to American Indians.
I can't say that I am mad at Mr. Ahmadinejad as I disagree with much of what he stands for, but I do believe that he has a right to his opinion.

2007-09-25 10:24:39 · answer #3 · answered by Dawn C 3 · 3 0

Because he pulls the same kinds of stunts you do, only he can deliver on his threats, so he is dangerous.

Palestinian "race"? What are you talking about? Maybe a people... but not a race! And Israel doesnt say there are no Palestinians. Even the right wing prime minister Olmert has spoken about a two state solution.... The worst enemy of the Palestinians are they themselves, more intent on killing Jews and Israelies then on setting up an independent state, which they could have done long time ago, as long as 1947, 60 years ago!

2007-09-25 10:23:55 · answer #4 · answered by Buzz 2 · 1 3

It is because this man is a loudmouthed *** , who is dragging his country into a confrontation with the USA and Israel by way of his personal aims at being the new age Arab god !!
And, this is a conflict that can only end in his country's total destruction at the heaviest of expense to his own people !!

The other part of your "question" has been successfully answered by a number of individuals --- Palestinians are NOT a race !! This group of nomads were simply ousted from a land that they were wandering around on !!
And, the holocaust DID happen --- and would happen again if this lunatic you have mentioned herein had his way about things !!
To judge this man by his Media Performance is to fall totally head over heels into a lie !! This is something he does VERY WELL -- manipulate media -- try a close look at his regime's control OF that entity within his own country -- and, take a close look at ALL of the material contributed BY this guy before making a profile here !!!

2007-09-25 10:29:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Because they are Bush-minded idiots but not all are mad at him.Well some idiots and the media have been thrashing him all along its was very pathetic plsu he didnt deny, he said more research needs to be done and it has nothing to do with the palestanains even if it had happen.i dontunderstand why some ppl are mad at him causehe just came over to give some facts which our media and Bush was covering up and all these accusations bush comes up with to solve his scew ups in iraq.
It was pathetic and disgrace to our country when the host insulted him i really felt soo pissed
here is an interview where we can see irans prez answers to some FAQ and see how our reporter thrashes him
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/20/60minutes/main3282230.shtml
plus idiots dont write "bush myths " on Y!A such as he sponser torrorism which bush claims but has nothing to back it up.

2007-09-25 10:40:30 · answer #6 · answered by Bassman 5 · 1 1

The Palestinians aren't a race. They were originally Syrian people. The name Palestinian came about when Israel seized its holy lands. Israel doesn't deny it stole their land, it just points to the UN mandate that allowed, and the subsequent 6 day war is apparently justification for seizing more land to act as a buffer.

2007-09-25 10:16:48 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1 3

Palestinians aren't a race. Caucasians are a race.

2007-09-25 10:19:42 · answer #8 · answered by joe s 6 · 0 0

I watched an interview with him on pbs last night. He seems like a very reasonable guy. He spoke about the American media, sayin that that media doesn't represent the people of the United States. It is awful how the reporter kept trying to corner him into saying something wrong, but he handled it very well. Speaking of why Iran is seeking nuclear power, and that he is not interested in nuclear weapons, because they are not useful in solving conflicts.

2007-09-25 10:28:10 · answer #9 · answered by WhoYaWit33 2 · 4 2

Palestine is a region, it was never a country and it was occupied by a number of arabic tribes. A-jad is supporting terrorism, supplying arms to the insurgents that are killing American troops, has declared that Israel should be wiped from the face of the Earth, his government kills homosexuals and women for little or no reason. The list goes on and on.

2007-09-25 10:18:48 · answer #10 · answered by booman17 7 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers