Without "free speech zones" to protect him from dissent, how GB fair?
2007-09-25 01:14:09 · 7 answers · asked by Holy Cow! 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He'd melt like butter on hot day.
2007-09-25 01:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by St. Tom Cruise 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First problem is the audience was hand picked. It was a room full of liberals! Second problem is you try to use the President and that terrorist in the same sentence. You lower the status of the position of president and elevate the status of a sub human that wants to help some 1,000 year old out of a well he fell into by blowing up the world. Do you see how your "hate Bush" blinders make you look like a driveling idiot? USMC 60-68
2007-09-25 02:07:03 · answer #2 · answered by grizzlytrack 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He would probably defeacate in his pants after being horoughly exposed for what he really is; a mass murderer. His situation would be made worse by the fact that he, unlike Ahmadinejad, is not intelligent enough to handle it without "protection".
2007-09-25 01:29:10 · answer #3 · answered by aminu2763 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You might get tazed like that tool who was drilling Kerry about the elections. But if you had something intelligent and NOT banterous to ask or say, you would probably get a decent answer...eventually.
2007-09-25 01:16:43 · answer #4 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
We would get some great new bushisms to laugh about.
2007-09-25 01:28:19 · answer #5 · answered by austin j 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everyone loves our emperor's new clothes, don't you know that?!
-------
By the way: you're FREE to call our "president" anything you wish. Of course, you know that already, since you're an American... I like to call him our Idiot King.
2007-09-25 01:18:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You would see something like 'Moonbats Gone Wild' and security would be forced to break out their tasers.
2007-09-25 01:17:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋