English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-25 00:06:02 · 9 answers · asked by The Mick 7 7 in Sports Football (American)

9 answers

They ruined that show with him, Emmitt Smith, and the Tuna Fish. I hated Michael Irvin when he played, but he was a damn good commentator. I liked when he got fired up. I think they need to get rid of half the guys on there. Keep Tom Jackson. He's the only one with brains.
Keyshawn is all about himself, even though I thought he was a punk when he played. Never had any speed, the only thing that made him good was his size. He keeps talking about Notre Dame saying that Charlie Weis is playing with players that he recruited. Yeah, the freshman and sophomores, but the juniors and seniors are all Tyrone Willingham. The freshman and sophomores are the best players on the team. He's says they don't have any speed, but we'll see next year and the year after. Weis has had two top ten recruiting classes, compared to Willingham's 40-70 top recruiting classes. That's why he's not there anymore.
Anyway, Keyshawn is a punkass.

2007-09-25 00:45:39 · answer #1 · answered by Stew 4 · 0 0

He is absolutely terrible! Bring back Michael Irvin, he seemed like an authoritative voice, and was funny as well. Keyshawn, is just too quiet. He just seems like some ghetto kid taken from the streets who played football on Madden, and now does commentary.

2007-09-25 07:13:23 · answer #2 · answered by Indyhawk2k 3 · 0 0

Loudmouth idiot. At least Michael Irvin was comical. I think ESPN must have an employee recruiter that is trained in finding tho most irritating candidates possible.

2007-09-25 08:44:32 · answer #3 · answered by stan l 7 · 0 0

the guy doesn't have one ounce of intelligence and you can tell that when Bill Parcells and him are sitting together Bill just wants to knock him over for the comments he makes. All he knows is football but he can't even make his statements legit. i was watching him on Sunday and he stuttered like 5 times and the analysis he made was so dumb. he needs to be kicked off. i liked Mike Irvin way better

2007-09-25 09:24:50 · answer #4 · answered by dancingstarr92 4 · 0 0

i dont like him on there. he is boring and stutters alot and doesnt always seem to say what he really means. i do however love the big tuna on espn i love that guy.

2007-09-25 07:58:15 · answer #5 · answered by Bob 3 · 0 0

Actually, I'm a little surprised. i thought he would be horrible but he really isn't that bad. then again, I hated Irvin.

2007-09-25 07:29:15 · answer #6 · answered by itsme6922 6 · 0 0

Yeah he is terrible. Just give me Tom Jackson and I am all set.

2007-09-25 08:45:26 · answer #7 · answered by The Lorax 6 · 0 0

I'll have to go with "Stew" about 100%. Well done, amigo.

2007-09-25 08:22:07 · answer #8 · answered by gato_del_sol_3 4 · 0 0

not too high. he is not contributing. self serving and promopting his personal antics

2007-09-25 07:34:15 · answer #9 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers