I manage a movie theatre and I've been fielding a lot of complaints recently from parents and teenagers who are frustrated because most of the movies in the last 5-6 weeks have been rated R. And the trend will mostly continue for the next 4-5 weeks.
2007-09-24
22:06:00
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Justin H
7
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Movies
spiderhedron: I have mixed feelings about being 17 to see R rated movies. I guess it would be one thing if the R rating had a somewhat consistent meaning, but it can encompass so many things. A parent sees an R rated movie like 3:10 to Yuma or Erin Brockovich and they think it's nothing major. But then they don't realize Superbad is something completely different.
The censorship angle is tricky. I think most would agree that the average 15-16 year-old would be just fine watching an R rated movie. But what about 13-14 year-olds? What about 12 and younger. The question is where do you draw the line. Used effectively, the rating system is not an attempt by the movie industry to censor it's products, it's a tool for parents to decide what's appropriate. I think the ratings system is a reasonable alternative to real censorship.
2007-09-24
22:33:03 ·
update #1
Chickon: I beg to differ with you. Of the 40 highest grossing films so far this year, only 6 of them have been rated R - and only 3 of the 21 films to gross over $100 million have been rated R. And it was the same story in 2006 except only 2 of the 19 to gross over $100 million were rated R.
While the group of parents who rate movies does change over time, there are some objective rules for rating movies. For example, two or more F bombs is always an R rating - one will do it if it's in a sexual context.
I appreciate your feedback, but you need to get your facts straight.
2007-09-25
09:00:44 ·
update #2