When will the religious start to accept evolution as fact (which it is) and argue...?

Question

... that it's "God's will" or "God's plan" or something?

Answer 1

I believe that our divine eternal soul spirit is an active participant in evolution of the seed body over time.

Answer 2

hi, i'm no longer threatened by ability of evolution, yet I do locate it to be quite inconceivable. The mathematical probability is astronomical that existence could have progressed. additionally, such useful factors such simply by fact the geological violence disprove the fossil technique. With any platetectonic pastime, the fossils would be mixed around. Likewise, even the discoverer of C-14 dating suggested that it became basically precise to around 500 years. different information incorporates the Earth's magnetosphere (the magnetic air of secrecy that surrounds the earth and prevents cosmic radiation from affecting us). that's been shown that the magnetosphere has a 0.5 existence of a million,4 hundred years, meaning that the magnetosphere would be 0.5 as good a million,4 hundred years from now and became two times as good a million,4 hundred years interior the previous. Given this, if the Earth became basically 10,000 years previous, it could have been a magnetar (a magnetic action picture star).

Answer 3

Which definition of evolution is in question here? I think one of the problems is that most people on both sides, at least it seems, focus on methods of evolution going from cells to fish to apes to man. At its basics, evolution is not much more than the concept that stuff changes. It is not that man came from apes. It is simply that over time, man's, or any species, inheritable genetics have and will change. It does not really imply that things will evolve into more complex organisms.

So under that concept, many of a God-based faith have stated they believe that the "day" of creation is just a term, and not a literal 24 hours. Thus any period of time could have passed as everything we know today formed which would support gradual change which is evolution.

Answer 4

Because that theory doesnt generate money for the churches, the more proof religion is a huge scam, the less money they get, and that my friend means trillions of money lost.Thats why the first Bush was so against the internet in the late 80s since more people would be able to share information like evolution.

Answer 5

When will the irreligious stop being ignorant bigots and realize that a very large number of the religious have long ago accepted evolution as fact?

Answer 6

Never,because their holy book tells them otherwise. God's will was clearly explained in Genesis. God made Adam in his image on the 6th day. If it was God's plan it would of been divinely revealed in the scpritures, which it is not.

Also, not forgetting that accepting evolution is science, thus logical conclusions from logical investigation and thus is incompatible with spritual absolutes.

Answer 7

Alot of us Christians, perhaps even the majority, don't have a problem with evolution. I guess you've just had contact with a limited number of Christians.

Answer 8

Yeah, according to Learn from the great teacher, it said
that each "god day" was somewhere between a thousand and a million years...so when he created Adam, it could've took some time for god to "Scuplt" his work until he got the form he liked......

Answer 9

As soon as ignorance starts to be viewed as a negative attribute.

notice how posters in this very questions don't know anything about statistics or something as basic as what a theory is. "religion is a theory". <- defines ignoance.

Answer 10

Depends on which type of evolution you are talking about.
If you are talking about changes within the 'kind' we already believe it.
If you are talking about lower species (less complex) evolving into higher species (more complex), we'll believe it as soon as you provide proof.