What is their political agenda for trying to explain the origins of life? Why are the methods they use "fiction"? It's claimed that scientists use fictational methods as fake evidence that points to evolution or the Big Bang theory. Are scientists controlled by the Devil to destroy the Christian faith?
I would seriously like to know why Creationists think a scientific theory is the "enemy" that you have to destroy.
PS
I only want serious answers, please. Why would scientists make this stuff up? What is the secret agenda scientists have for spreading the "lies" of evolution and the Big Bang theory?
2007-09-24 10:14:10 · 10 answers · asked by word 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, I'm an Atheist asking Creationists (not every Christian), why they think scientists are lying.
2007-09-24 10:21:03 · update #1
OK, why would scientists need to use the theory of evolution to get grants? So they are pretending to be researching evolution, but secretly, they are using the grants for some other scientific scheme? Couldn't they just get a grant for that scientific research? Or, do you think scientists are pocketing the money from grants? I'm sure it's not that easy, and I don't think the majority of the scientific community is wealthy. Sorry, I am just trying to understand what this secret agenda is, and why they have it...
2007-09-24 10:59:13 · update #2
it's an easy way to dismiss science. the people that are told that are not scientifically inclined to dispute what they hear. if they are told scientists are lying, the agree because they want to and because they can't refute it.
2007-09-24 10:28:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scientists lie for money mostly. They are under nondisclosure contracts from the time the entire grad school. The are owned outright by either the government (would they lie), or corporations (same question).
A good example is Roundup herbicides, genetically altered to kill everything except Roundup seeds. What's the lie? Crop circles. From the start Monsanto snuck into contracted fields to see if the farmers were actually using their products. The result was weird shapes in the crop. The myth was fostered and spread by the corporation itself, until the patent expired. Oops, no more crop circles!
The theory of evolution works hand in hand with gene engineering. And now, with the push to produce grain-ahol, you can look for more corporate/government lies about why the price of food is going to sky-rocket. (The meat you eat, is feed the corn you want to burn).
Sorry for the rant, but I think Christ said, "Feed my sheep," not, "burn the crops."
2007-09-24 17:39:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You could easily take your question, remove Scientist, and plug in Religiousness and the results would be the same, would they not?
How would one ever know Truth unless they sought it out for themselves?
Science, like religion, is a perspective-Interpretation based on what one is taught.
To put it more wisley: As Spritual beings, we live in a system (physical) that is teaching us what Mental energy is, and how to use it. We do this by constantly transforming our thoughts and emotions into physical form. We are suppose to get a clear picture of our inner development(s) by perceiving the exterior environment. What seems to be perception, an objective concrete event independant from you, is instead the materialzation of our own inner emotions, energy, and mental environemnt.
In Short, we creat and co-creat, so examine perspectives first before one elects to support idiologies of "Reality".
This requires self dicipline and thinking absent blindly following some one elses ideas of "God", Church...and religions.
2007-09-24 17:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by Adonai 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems to be a general trait of Scientists involved in evolution, evolution is such a useful medium to manipulate for another grant or that pulitzer prize book and for vainglory.
I cite one Richard Dawkins aka; the Ego has landed.
2007-09-24 17:26:38 · answer #4 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The nice thing about science is that if you make stuff up, there's always another scientist in the field who will call you on your BS. Which begs the question of what, exactly, they're lying about and why creationists can't seem to respond with anything other than verbal debate.
2007-09-24 17:20:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Where did he say he was a christian?
Obviously the scientists don't have an agenda, unlike their detractors. They're only interested in finding the truth. If we discover something that disproves something it says in the bible should we really throw away truth and logic or should we rely less on an ancient bronze-age myth? I wish the correct answer was obvious to everyone.
2007-09-24 17:20:28 · answer #6 · answered by Leviathan 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
christians have always treated science that wasnt controled by them as the enamy, because if they arnt in control it is the enamy.science is about free thought and following the prosses and logic and religion is agaisnt all those things.
2007-09-24 17:23:52 · answer #7 · answered by stacy o 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's just what Christian preachers make up so that their flocks won't fall victim to reality.
2007-09-24 17:20:21 · answer #8 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have some evidence showing these "lies"?
Yeah, I didn't think so either...
2007-09-24 17:22:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're an atheist pretending to be a Christian to make them look bad.
2007-09-24 17:19:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋